Cluster Schools

Updated on March 11, 2013
G.D. asks from Detroit, MI
4 answers

Our local school district is facing a deficit. Enrollment is down. The school board is considering closing one of our four elementary schools and making the remaining three cluster schools. One would be k-1, one 2-3, and one 4-5. The board has all approved this transition and is giving the public a chance to speak this Tuesday before the final vote next Monday. The three schools are within 2miles of each other and will all have different start and dismissal times. The board will provide a bus and residents will drop thir kids at their local school to be busses to the appropriate school.
I have 4 kids that will attend the district schools next year. My 3 LOVE their current school and want to stay there and the 4th is looking forward to joining them.
Does anyone have experience with cluster schools? A principal from another school district that did this years ago will be at the meeting. My concerns outside the obvious are home values ( wouldn't have bought here myself if I would have forseen this), sense of community, and the kids having a sheltered elementary experience. Traffic is not pretty in the am. A lot of parents double park and pull up right when the bell rings. Do we really want to add busses to the mix?
Just looking for some insight to prepare for this community meeting.

What can I do next?

  • Add yourAnswer own comment
  • Ask your own question Add Question
  • Join the Mamapedia community Mamapedia
  • as inappropriate
  • this with your friends

So What Happened?

Great responses. The information I have so far us from a short newspaper article and word of mouth from other (outraged) parents. The article says that the board proposed bussing resident children to the school for their grade. I do think that transportation needs to be addressed as I would have 4 kids to drop at 3 schools and still try and make it to work.
I understand the benefits of a cluster schools, but would consider another school system. I was bullied throughout elementary school, and probably wouldn't do as well in my work office without the experiences (many workplaces have an assortment of crybabies, backstabbers, bullies etc.) I know MY kids and I don't want them in schools where the opportunity to grow and learn with a broad range of students is not available.

More Answers

Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

P.K.

answers from New York on

It works great. For those that say, kids won't be with siblings, changing schools every few years is a problem: this teaches kids to be flexible and to learn how to go with the flow so to speak. Due to special Ed program having classes in various towns where I live, my daughter had to change schools every year until middle school when she was phased out of special Ed. She did well. If kids take school buses (and buses are a great part of growing up) parents do not have to drive them. So I see it as a win, win for all. Change is not always a bad thing. Embrace it!

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

D.K.

answers from Pittsburgh on

The cluster idea sounds very interesting. I think it might be really good to have 3 (or 4) k-1 classes in one building rather than what I assume would be one class per grade the way you are. It gives more options if there is an issue with one teacher and completely eliminates any big kids bullying little kids issues.

I am confused about the transportation however. Do you currently have school buses or not? If not and the schools are so close together, why don't the parents just drop the kids at the correct school - not at the closest school?

1 mom found this helpful
Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

J.B.

answers from Boston on

Your district sounds similar to mine and IMO works well. We are not a tiny district (4,000 total) but not huge either. We have three schools that each house pre-school through grade 2. Then we have one huge secondary elementary school that used to be two schools that shared the same building but they recently assigned one administrative team to the whole school. The students are still assigned to one side or the other for the time they are there, grades 3-5. Then we have one middle school for grades 6-8 and one 9-12 high school. We have three different schedules (primary, secondary, and then middle/high school).

I honestly think that the bus idea is asinine - would parents really not drive two more miles to school if they're driving already anyway? That's 5 minutes. I doubt many parents would use such a service and it sounds stupid from a logistical standpoint. It also sounds like drop off and pick up needs to be overhauled anyway. There is no reason for school traffic to not be civilized and orderly, someone just needs to put a logical plan in place that works and then be out there enforcing it until people learn the new system.

I think the segmentation works - it gives greater flexibility in placing students with the teachers who are a best fit for them and pools resources for SPED, PE, art, music, library, enrichment etc. that are most age appropriate. Having a whole building full of educators who are dedicated to teaching and administering to a certain age group is a wonderful thing. The environments at the schools my children go to (I have 4 in three different schools) are all great because they are geared towards their particular ages when they are there. The primary school has playground equipment, a cafeteria set up and library set up and books geared just to little kids. The secondary elementary school has different playground equipment and other things geared just for the 8-12 year old group, etc. There is a big difference between a 5 year old entering K and a 6th grader who has hit puberty - smaller grade groupings address that.

At the end of the day, I don't think your home values will decrease, you won't lose your sense of community, and the children will not be overly sheltered. There are benefits to both methods. I grew up in a Catholic school that was K-8 with one class per grade. There were definitely down sides to that. Our town went through a pretty big overhaul a few years ago where the 9th grade moved to high school, 6th to middle school, 3rd to secondary, and the secondary school placement (which half your child was in) went from geographic to random. People got all fired up over everything - lots of name calling, letters to the editor, the sky is falling talk and the changes went through anyway and we are all fine.

I know that change is hard, especially when it comes to our kids, but what your district is proposing is actually the norm in many places. I think someone should step up and address the bus and drop off issue but other than those, it sounds like a fine plan to me.

Smallavatar-fefd015f3e6a23a79637b7ec8e9ddaa6

M.S.

answers from Portland on

My sister's school district did this a few years ago, and they are back to neighborhood schools already. It was ok because the kids stay with their friends the whole time since the kids move building together, but it is crazy. I know that my sis had a hard time getting the kids to the different schools at the same time, but maybe alternating times will work. I dont' honestly know. My problem with it is that kids are always doing something new, and while for some that is great, for others, it is a castastrophe! and they wont' get to be with their siblings in the same school. But, it is not the worst thing a school district could do, so if you have to take it, it could be a lot worse. I would listen to both sides and see what they say.

For Updates and Special Promotions
Follow Us

Related Questions