R.D. asks from Richmond, VA on December 23, 2011
Toys and Tats Charitable Drive.... DONATIONS DENIED!!
My tattoo artist owns his own shop, and every year I help him do the 'Toys and Tats' charitable drive.
Basically, you can get a free, small tattoo off the wall (no custom work, but you can get a discount on a custom tattoo if you participate) in exchange for kids toys, which are in turn donated to a children's network. The artists make NO money off this; they are donating their time and talent to help out kids.
In past years, the turn out has been HUGE!!... I've never seen so many adorable little soccer mom's in there getting tiny tattoos just to help some kids... it's great!! Even if someone doesn't want work done, they are still welcome to help out, of course!
THIS year, and this to me is unbelievable, they were turned down to EVERY local intake office for children. 'Orphanages', children's hospitals, etc... NO ONE WANTED THESE GIFTS FOR THE CHILDREN.
Broke. My. Heart.
They would not accept the donation solely based on the fact that they were coming from people who have/create tattoos.
Really, I get that most people aren't fond of tattoos, I do!.... but to turn down free gifts, brand new in the packages, for needy children!?
Can someone please explain that to me?!
There is some biker 'gang', an organization who's name I can't think of at the moment, who does something similar, and collects teddy bears for sick children, who are apparently under the same kind of fire....
How is that fair to the kids?! I don't understand this at ALL.
The owner was finally able to donate to a children's hospital after he got his (very un-tattooed) friend to make the donation.
HOLY STEREOTYPE. Here we are, breaking said stereotype, helping out the less fortunate out of the kindness of our hearts, only to have our donations denied.
And yes, the organizations that were approached flat out said they would not accept the gifts from 'this type'.
So sad... I mean, I'm glad we were finally able to make the donation, but only under a non-tattooed person.
Can someone help me understand the thought process here?! What are YOUR thoughts?
So What Happened?™
@Tracy K, honest, it's as cut and dry as it seems. They've done this for 6 years now and this is the first year they've had this issue. Even previous recipients turned them down.
I get it to a very small extent. The owner of the shop is probably one of the scariest looking people you'll ever meet. BUT... he's a huge teddy bear! He's on the PTA, he sends his son to private school, he's always hosting charitable events... I just don't understand why this happened this year.
I could understand if someone said 'Hey, we've maxed out our storage space for donations, but thank you, here try this other organization'... but no. They don't want donations coming from tattoo artists.
Also, this is RICHMOND we're talking about, the biggest melting pot next to New York. I don't get it :(
@1growingupfast (cute name!)... nope, all brand new, in the box toys!
Featured Answers
B.. answers from Dallas on December 23, 2011
Well, they went and made it about who donated instead of ABOUT THE CHILDREN. Who are needy, sick, or will go giftless. Seriously?!!!!
Asses.
5 moms found this helpful
S.B. answers from Kansas City on December 23, 2011
Well, that's definately the dumbest thing I've heard today. I'm glad you were able to eventually get the gifts to someone.
3 moms found this helpful
J.W. answers from St. Louis on December 23, 2011
I would love to explain the thought process but it eludes me at the moment. It is as if the perceived reputation of the receiving organization is more important than helping the kids the organization claims to do.
3 moms found this helpful
More Answers
R.J. answers from Seattle on December 23, 2011
Wow.
I can't even imagine that happening here... but then again... my son's surgeon (Children's Hosp Seattle) has full sleeves. Ink is drop dead NORMAL here.
6 moms found this helpful
B.. answers from Dallas on December 23, 2011
Well, they went and made it about who donated instead of ABOUT THE CHILDREN. Who are needy, sick, or will go giftless. Seriously?!!!!
Asses.
5 moms found this helpful
A.C. answers from Salt Lake City on December 23, 2011
You have got to be kidding! Tattoos are so common place these days, it really surprises me that this would be a problem! I hope someone else can shed some light on why this happened
5 moms found this helpful
L.U. answers from Seattle on December 23, 2011
I was going to say the same thing as Riley J. My son spent quite a bit of time in Children's Hospital and some of the best doctors he had had tattoos. I suggest writing a letter to EACH and every one of the organizations that denied the toys and making the heading to the CEO. I have to wonder if the organizations bosses knew that they were denying gifts because of tats.
Laura
5 moms found this helpful
K.M. answers from Chicago on December 23, 2011
Then come and do it here in Chicago area ... we have strippers giving quick lap dances in exchange for toys to local churches
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Strip-Club-Offers-La...
I do not really care how they were obtained just so long as they were obtained with the intention of love, giving and kindness.
5 moms found this helpful
☆.A. answers from Pittsburgh on December 23, 2011
I'm kind of with Tracy K. I'm not saying I don't believe you, but this is just unbelievable. Maybe he missed the cut off deadline or there is more to the story than you are seeing?
4 moms found this helpful
L.R. answers from Washington DC on December 23, 2011
Wow. I really have to wonder if there was some miscommunication? You said that "the organizations" "flat out said" they wouldn't take the gifts -- but was this really the organization spokesperson or leader for that local group/hospital/orphanage, or some individual volunteer who just happened to be at the toy intake at that particular moment and who was perhaps....to put it nicely, misinformed, and to put it more frankly, biased?
I have heard of groups turning down soft, plush or stuffed toys that were not in any packaging, because of the risk of kids having allergies to the stuffing and/or the risk that there was no way for the receiving organization to know for certain the toys were not used. But I have never heard of what you describe, if the recipients actually said the tats were the reason for refusal. I understand your being appalled.
Before blasting the whole organization, R., instead I'd first write calmly to the organization's president/whoever's in charge (do it for each organization that said no). Describe exactly the date and time the toys were taken to them; the location where someone attempted to drop off the toys; the types of toys brought (with examples) and if you possibly got it, the names of the people that turned them down. I'd tell the organization how saddened and frustrated Toys for Tats was to be turned away with brand new packaged toys in hand, and I would add if possible exactly what was said to the Toys for Tats person who was there. Then I'd list the names of other organizations that have accepted and worked with Toys for Tats in the past.
Add that you would like to know, in writing, if this incident was a one-time problem with a single volunteer who should not have turned away the donation, or if this reflects a specific policy of the group. In other words -- give them the old "here are the details, we can't believe this is YOUR group and surely it was one worker's mistake" treatment rather than blasting them. Letters citing dates, times, names and incidents tend to get organizations' attention and action much more effectively than a call or an angry letter full of accusations. Give it a try. (You'll also keep on breaking those stereotypes of how "people with tats" would react to all this--react like a bunch of lawyers and maybe they'll realize that some lawyers have tats!)
I would bet that people over the heads of the workers who turned the toys away might just be furious themselves if they find out these toys were turned away.
Then, if you don't get a prompt and apologetic response...Call the local newspaper and TV station!
I do hope it mostly ends up being misunderstandings or misinformed volunteers. If there is actually a policy about not taking toys from people who look a certain way, where could that end up? Not taking toys from donors because of their race? Or their gender? Or because they don't look affluent enough themselves to be donating toys?....
4 moms found this helpful
N.B. answers from Minneapolis on December 23, 2011
I would email the story in to a local news station...see if they pick it up? Maybe the negative publicity (to the denying organizations..not your fellow Tatters) would change the future endeavors???
Thats just insane!
4 moms found this helpful
Email