M.Z. asks from Spicewood, TX on September 13, 2008
Contradiction of the Rpos
i was recently reading the "strongwilled child" and found it extremely helpful although outdated. there was a huge contradiction with some of the newer methods of parenting such as those taught in "raising children who think for themselves". how do you even resolve such a contradction of this size? the problem is the older doctor favors the method of teaching children dicipline externally believing they have no internal factors to direct them, while the newer doctor suggests laying off on external direction beleiving children will not learn to think for themselves instead be lead by those older because theywere taught to do so. normally a parent would use their own judgement on the matter as to what works best for them. i figure experience would weigh out. whats your take?
M.
Featured Answers
P.H. answers from Houston on September 24, 2008
I am a mother of 5 grown children. I wish I had Dr. Dobson the whole time they were growing up. He has such wisdom! It is great you are looking for help. Parenting is a difficult job. I do agree that children have no internal factors to direct them--they are totally self absorbed. Although example does play a part in the learning process, I don't believe it is enough. I had a child who had great difficulty ever getting beyond external influence---it was not fun.
More Answers
M.S. answers from San Antonio on September 15, 2008
I think you can do both...because part of your job is to raise a child who can make good decisions. I have used many many of Dr. Dobson's parenting techniques. Because I am the mom and I am in charge. However, I give my children reasonable choices all the time to help the realize they have some choice and can make good ones. Red shirt or blue one? Do you want to bring your drawing board or your action figure in the car? And let them learn small lessons on their own and live with the consequences...I wouldn't take your happy meal toy into the play land with you, it might get lost. My son tells me he will be very careful...I say okay, but if it gets lost you don't get another one. After the first time we went home toy-less, he now likes to leave it at the table. You can teach them to think for themselves, but still be firmly in charge. They need you as the parent to be in charge.
{{{{hugs}}}}
1 mom found this helpful
A.M. answers from Austin on September 15, 2008
Here's my take: beware the pendulum swing. I had several friends who had very strict, this-is-the-law-don't-even-ask-why parents, and then when they got to college and there was no one looking over their shoulders anymore, went wild. My friends and I who had parents who encouraged us as teens to make our own decisions did not attend the wild parties or fail out of college.
Not that we did the wild stuff in high school, either. My mother did something very ingenious, I think, that I intend to do with my own daughter. My mom told me that if there was ever a situation that I did not want to be in or that I was uncomfortable with, I could blame my reluctance on my over-strict mother, who would back me up with no question. My close friends knew better, and knew what to not even ask me to participate in, but for friends of friends, it took peer pressure right out of the equation.
1 mom found this helpful
J.M. answers from Austin on September 14, 2008
Hi! My niece in Pennsylvania is named M.! I am also reading The Stong Willed Child right now. Dr. Dobson has an updated version out called The New Strong Willed Child. They are both excellent. He also has written many more such as The Parent Answer Book, Parenting Isn't for Cowards, Bringing up Boys, etc.
I believe the difference you see in Dr. Dobson's methods stem from his world view. Dr. Dobson is a Bible believing Christian. He doesn't see children as a blank slate that we as parents and society write upon. Instead, he believes that each child is a unique creation of God, with individual personalities and giftedness, as well as an inborn sin nature at birth. This sin nature is in all of us, and is why we are separated from God unless we believe in Jesus Christ, who's sacrifice on the cross covers over our sin so that we are righteous in God's sight and can then have a relationship with Him. Dr. Dobson asserts that it is our job as parents to help the child develop his or her God-given potential while teaching them to place their trust in Jesus Christ's sufficient sacrifice, so that one day, they will be a new creation, wholly and pleasing to God. This is not of ourselves, that we should boast, but is God's gift to us - to all who believe.
Because of this world view, Dr. Dobson doesn't believe that a child has the ability to self-govern themselves without external direction, as you say, because they are not yet controlled by God's Holy Spirit, which he sent to be our comforter and guide when Jesus Christ ascended into heaven. This Holy Spirit is given to us at the moment of Salvation, when we accept Jesus' sacrifice on our behalf.
If you'd like to know more, please visit Dr. Dobson's website at family.org.
1 mom found this helpful
J.W. answers from Houston on September 15, 2008
M.
I'm with you on this one.
I feel that we as parents set the boundaries. Children through their non-experience of life cannot be expected to carry such a burden. They are not "mini-adults" at all.
We decide what is best for them as parents, going by instinct (never underestimate a mother's instincts) as we know our children far better than anyone else, even authors of books and doctors. Then we guide them to that direction by everything we do and say, leading by example preferably.
I watched a TV program where a child would not go to bed and the parents had to return her 281 times! That just shows the forceful power that children have if given the opportunity. The next night the child fell asleep peacefully!
We have to direct our children..
All the best
1 mom found this helpful
L.R. answers from Portland on September 15, 2008
Here's how I understand things. At a very young age, children should learn to obey implicitly and without question. This is before they are able to understand the reason why. As they get older, you will be giving more explanations and helping them reason from cause to effect. There should be a transition so that by the time they are in their mid teens you wouldn't be giving any commands per se, but rather guiding them in making their own decisions, preparatory to full independence.
What we have going on here (with the contradictions) is the old pendulum effect. Back in the day (like, when our parents were kids), the authoritarian view was very strong, and kids learned to obey without question. The problem is that the parents didn't know how to transition the child into making their own decisions, and so many rebelled, as can be seen in the Hippie revolution. Then the more permissive methods of parenting came into vogue, with the resultant lack of control on the part of parents and teachers of the youth of our day.
So basically I would look at it like this. Children do have internal factors, such as a need to be loved and understood, but they also need authority in their lives. When my 22 mo is obeying me, she is very happy. When she decides to resist me, she is miserable. I insist she obey me, however, and she usually submits within a few minutes (because I try never to let her get her way when she is being obstinate). But that doesn't mean I dictate every move she makes. She is free to choose what to play with within limits (my sewing pins are not toys!), and other small choices. But only if she asks sweetly. If she asks in a tone that says, "You'd better give it to me or else!" then she doesn't get it and usually ends up spending some time in the corner, which usually has the effect of sweetening her disposition. :)
As she gets older, I will help her learn to think for herself. By the time she's 18, she should be able to live alone and I will have worked my self out of a job as a parent. I expect to treat her as an equal at that point. Of course, I will still have all the younger siblings (#2 is on the way now, and we want more), so should life will never be boring!
I hope this helps.
L.
H.F. answers from San Angelo on September 15, 2008
I was heavily disciplined as a child...I will admit, too much so. I was raised to "do as I was told" and I did. That never meant that I didn't ever have my own thoughts. If anything, I rebelled against the notion that my parents knew best (It got me into some trouble as a teenager, but not real trouble). I later joined the military (they tell you what to do too) but I emerged immediately as a leader, not a follower. I also have a strong opinion...sometimes too much so, but I think that is because I feel the need to constantly defend my opinion now that I am "allowed" to have one. I think moderation is the key to any method.
I also think it really has to do with the temperment of the child. With my two year old for example, I have to give him choices (that I determine). If I try to tell him what to do, we will end up with a stalemate in our battle of wills...neither will give up and there will be a lot of crying and stomping...my son will behave badly too :)
Giving choices is also good for older kids because it does allow them to use reason in making choices. In the perfect situation there should be one bad choice and two other better choices so the child should become accustomed to ruling out the bad choice right away. This of course is great in theory, but kids will always surprise you...that's why my child contantly wears rainboots when it is sunny...despite my choice offerings he will go for his own desires. Good luck figuring out what is best for your little ones...I think we are all in the same boat!
C.A. answers from Longview on September 15, 2008
I have never read the strong willed child, but I do believe that when I child is young, God set us as parents to guide and teach our child - with discipline and correction so as to develop their consciences. In the beginning of a child's life, you will teach him his sense of right and wrong. Either you will do it by neglecting to teach the child, letting the child think that they are all that is important, and therefor setting a very warped version of right and wrong, or you can teach them to obey, listen and learn, giving them boundaries and structure. When these children grow up, they will have responsibility, and will be able to slowly move toward making wise decisions for themselves as they move toward adulthood. If we, as parents, are not set in place to lovingly teach our children right from wrong, what would be the point of having parents at all?
J.P. answers from Austin on September 15, 2008
Well, here's my take on it. I must admit I have never read the book, but from your comments this is what I think:
I have two very strong willed children under 5. My son is oldest and will be 5 next month (although you'd think he was going to be 35). I do not believe that a child this age can make BIG decisions about disciplining themselves only because they have no life experience to lead them on. Now, I do discipline my kids and TEACH them about right and wrong, BUT I am sure to make their options known. What I mean to say by this is: My son get's disciplined when he does something wrong, but he is very award of the consequences before he does this. For example, he loves to cut things with sharp knives, however, he knows that first he must ASK. His choices are: Get in trouble for not asking, or potentially cut his finger. He has done both! Now, this is not to say I let him "do what he wants", but you can only tell a child for so long, "don't touch the stove" and eventually the just need to get the concept that the darned stove is hot!! Now, how in the world to you explain "HOT" to a child that has never been burned?? You can't!! Just like you cannot explain the concept of child birth to a MAN, unless they have done it, they will just never know.
Now, other ways I do get my children to think for themselves? "Mom, how does this work?".... Me: "Figure it out... look around.. do you see a plug.. a switch... does it have batteries?" Then I make then LOOK at it for a moment and I walk away. This, believe it or not, REALLY works. They will sit down and figure it out. My daughter is afraid of spiders (shes almost 3). She screamed once and I picked up a stick and scraped away the spider web and then said "spider is gone" and walked away. Now, when she screams, I tell her to take care of it herself. She will search for a stick, broom, rake or whatever to handle the situation herself, she no longer wants me to take care of it. She thinks for herself, but, at first, someone had to give her an example of how to deal with this situation.
Now, with all this being said, I do lay off "external direction" per se to let the children learn for themselves, but they do still need guidance to determine the right directions to head. You cannot effectively parent (in my opinion) by just letting them fend for themselves (at least not at this young age) and where are they going to get examples from if you don't give them to them. Children need to be disciplined but need guidance to determine right from wrong, once they know, they can be expected (within reason) to make choices from there on their own and deal with the potential consequences, good or bad. This in and of itself is a learning experience and a method of discipline.
I hope this isn't confusing you, but it's my take on things.
Email