M.S. asks from Albany, CA on August 05, 2010
Planning for a 3Rd Child
My husband and I have decided we will have a third child... someday. The entire extended family on my husband's side is planning a trip - which will occur after we would have another baby - and the purpose of the trip is specifically for the older children. My husband and I have already decided that we want to focus on our two other children who will be 5 & 6 at the time of the trip and the baby would stay home with my parents. My dilemma is that I know I will have a really hard time leaving a little one home. I don't think I could leave a baby for a week before its first birthday or while breastfeeding, but I also know that it will be devastating to me to leave if it upsets a baby/toddler. I am trying to figure out if there is an age that would be easier on both me and baby. I understand it is stupid to plan a pregnancy around a vacation several years down the road, and there are several other deciding factors, but its something for us to consider. Opinions welcome!
So What Happened?™
Thank you for all the great advice. Our trip is going to be to Disneyworld, so it is a very family oriented destination. I would not be concerned bringing a newborn along, but the baby would be between 1 and 2 years old and I think it's important that the older kids get that time alone with Mommy and Daddy. I nursed my daughter until she was 15 months old, and would like to nurse at least that long again. My son and daughter both, around 18 months, suffered from severe separation anxiety and that upsets me too. My parents actually only live a few blocks away, and I am confident the baby would be in good hands and well taken care of.
We will figure out the best situation when the time comes, I'm sure. I never like leaving kids at home. My husband and I have a general time frame that we would like to get pregnant, but we don't have anything specific in mind - I guess we will just let nature take its course and make the decision when the time comes.
Thanks for all the great advice and support!
Featured Answers
G.L. answers from Salt Lake City on August 06, 2010
If you are breastfeeding, leaving baby behind is not really an option. How disruptive would it be to take him/her with you? If the baby is under 6 months, he or she won't be crawling yet, and will be very portable. Baby can nap in the backpack or sling while you do things with the older ones. It does mean dealing with diapers, but it also means that you can feed the baby any time or place, and baby can sleep with you, so no extra bed is required. My daughter was born overseas, and we traveled a great deal with her in her infancy. It was actually much easier taking her with us before she was a year old.
More Answers
M.S. answers from Los Angeles on August 05, 2010
cant you just wait til the baby is a yr old and then do the trip? or cant your husband go on the trip and you stay with child? whatever you decide will be the best!!!! good luck!!!!
1 mom found this helpful
J.C. answers from Medford on August 05, 2010
Is there any possibility of bringing a caregiver (your mom, a younger cousin, a trusted sitter) with you on your trip? That way you could still bring the baby/toddler but be free to enjoy your older kids.
If you've definitely chosen to leave the baby behind, my personal opinion is that if you can bond a baby to the grandparents early on, it would be easier to leave them when they are younger, like between 3 and 6 months. When I say easier, I'm thinking for the child, not necessarily for you. Of course that would mean bottle training for the event. Best of luck with whatever you decide.
K.D. answers from Denver on August 05, 2010
My husband's last job gave us several travel opportunities. We went away for a week or two with kids between 18 and months and 2 years, plus older siblings, and the only thing we found is that it's easier if you are leaving more than one child behind, so maybe letting them stay with cousins might help. The kids always did better than I did. I never had the advantage of taking the older kids. I think that would make it easier. I think the older kids would really think that was special. You'd have to think about how the baby would feel when he gets old enough to feel left out, so maybe do something later just as big with everyone. Anyway you decide, have fun!
M.B. answers from Colorado Springs on August 06, 2010
Bring one of your parents with you on the trip - they can watch the baby while you do 'big kid' activities.
OOPS....just read that others had same suggestion. I agree!
C.E. answers from Provo on August 06, 2010
it's nice to read a post of someone not interested in leaving an infant for a week. i feel the same as you. my boys were weaned at 14 and 15 months. i did leave them with grandparents overnight a few times after they were weaned, but i wasn't comfortable with longer periods of time until they were two. my daughter has been much more afraid of people, even relatives. she is 23 months and i could probably wean her by her 2nd birthday but she would not handle spending the night at grandma's well yet, even with her brothers there. she is very attached to me and still afraid of men other than her dad. i hope that helps. good luck!
G.L. answers from Salt Lake City on August 06, 2010
If you are breastfeeding, leaving baby behind is not really an option. How disruptive would it be to take him/her with you? If the baby is under 6 months, he or she won't be crawling yet, and will be very portable. Baby can nap in the backpack or sling while you do things with the older ones. It does mean dealing with diapers, but it also means that you can feed the baby any time or place, and baby can sleep with you, so no extra bed is required. My daughter was born overseas, and we traveled a great deal with her in her infancy. It was actually much easier taking her with us before she was a year old.
F.B. answers from Fort Collins on August 06, 2010
I think it depends a lot on how involved your parents would be during your baby's infancy. My own parents live far away and I'd be worried about leaving an infant with them for a week when they're not used to each other. On the other hand, I would feel fairly comfortable leaving my 7-month-old with her nanny for a week if there was a pressing reason to do so. (Although it would be annoying to have to pump all week.)
A friend of mine who lives close to her in-laws has them babysitting her children once a week during the day, and even when they were under a year they would often spend the night. I would imagine she would be fine leaving the baby with the grandparents for a week. (And actually I think she did so in order to have a reconnection vacation with her husband.)
J.P. answers from Denver on August 06, 2010
Hi--
I would never leave an infant either, so I can relate. The question is, why couldn't you take an infant with you and possibly bring your mother or Nanny along? You could always have the nanny take the baby back to the hotel for his/her nap while you stayed with the older children. Third babies are typically very easy going because they have no choice. If you chose to leave the baby home, I wouldn't do it during the ages that separation anxiety rears it's head--so go before 8 months or after about 20 months. Also, I was a nanny in college and they left their 2 year old and 5 year old for 3 weeks--it was super tough on the 2 year old and caused lots of insecure attachment issues--just something to consider. But my vote, take the baby with!
J.
Email