M.J. asks from Andrews, TX on July 28, 2009
Newborn Being Kept in Hospital for "Infection" Additional 7 Days
My sister had her first baby yesterday via forcepts after an extremely long and hard labor. The baby looks perfectly healthy and is eating well. We were told by the pediatrition that she needed 48 hours of antibiotics for an unspecified infection. The antibiotics were started at midnight last night via IV. Today, he said that it is necessary for her to remain on antibiotics for an 7 additional days. He said that she has a "general infection". Has anyone else had this issue? Should we be looking for a second opinion? Please advise!!!!
1 mom found this helpful
Featured Answers
L.W. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
M., my first thought is this...was there any damage done with the forceps? I am in no means discrediting the Dr. but is it possible that the antibiotics are a cover up for damage done by forceps & they need time to see if the baby is ok? First of all is the pediatrician the one who delivered the baby?? As for infection, blood work is the only thing that shows an infection & it should what kind & where the infection is. Not just as general infection ( mu opinion) I would definitely want to see lab work results and want proof of infection & what type infection, if they cannot provide that, then yes as the other mom said, get a second opinion! It is not "ok" not to know exactly whats going on with that new baby.
Let us know the outcome, please!
1 mom found this helpful
K.P. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
You're in a hospital full of doctors and a new baby. If you question anything get the second opinion. Keep asking questions.
More Answers
S.R. answers from Austin on July 29, 2009
very frequently the mother may be carrying an infection (commonly known as group b strep). If they have a positive culture from the mom and possibly now from the baby, they will treat for 7-10 days. Untreated this infection is very dangerous to the infant and can cause traumatic life long injury. Pediatricians do not take this lightly. Sometimes if the mother has a positive culture before delivery, they can treat her with antibiotics instead. this doesn't sound like the case. Hope this helps
1 mom found this helpful
N.K. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
M.,
My 9 year old daughter was born via forcepts after an Extremely long hard labor as well... the same thing happend she need to be in the NICU for 7 days of antibiotics.. and the reason was a "general infection". of course i was worried, but just as the nurse's told me it is better to be safe then sorry. If she had been taken off the antibiotics then if the general infection became serious her body was not ready to handle that type of infection. but if she (which did stay for 7 days) stayed on the antibiotics, her immune system was receiving a jump start and this could save her life. So just tell your sister to stay strong, and let the Dr's be the Dr.s ...
1 mom found this helpful
K.E. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
My son was born 5 weeks early. I was in labor for a long time and did not realize my water had broken before I went to the hospital. He appeared healthy at first, but during the observation period, he had sleep apnea 3 times. At that time, they moved him to the NICU. They ran numerous tests and they all came back negative. He was in the NICU for 7 days on antibiotics because "something was wrong with him." The neonatal physican could not explain why they were giving him antiobiotics. The physican later said he may need to stay longer. After speaking with risk management, we agreed to let him finish the course of the antibiotics (7 days) and then take him home. My son is now a very ACTIVE 23 month old. I now have a 2 month old who was born healthy. The same neonatal physican was assigned to him, and my husband requested she not work with my son.
Your sister needs to ask exactly what they are treating the baby for and the type of antibiotic. If I could have re-done things, I would have gotten a second opinion.
1 mom found this helpful
L.W. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
M., my first thought is this...was there any damage done with the forceps? I am in no means discrediting the Dr. but is it possible that the antibiotics are a cover up for damage done by forceps & they need time to see if the baby is ok? First of all is the pediatrician the one who delivered the baby?? As for infection, blood work is the only thing that shows an infection & it should what kind & where the infection is. Not just as general infection ( mu opinion) I would definitely want to see lab work results and want proof of infection & what type infection, if they cannot provide that, then yes as the other mom said, get a second opinion! It is not "ok" not to know exactly whats going on with that new baby.
Let us know the outcome, please!
1 mom found this helpful
M.P. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
I would definately get a second opinion. Does the hospital have a NICU? If so, our experience was our son was put in the NICU for no apparent reason and kept for 7 days racking up a HUGE bill with nothing in the end wrong with him. We feel as though they jumped the gun simply because a NICU was available.
I would certainly get a second opinion and possibly a third if you felt there was anything out of the ordinary or you are not getting the answers you think you deserve.
Document EVERYTHING just in case something happens in the end.
1 mom found this helpful
S.T. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
Well...it depends. Did she have the baby at Woman's? They have sought to keep all my children, even when the pediatrician said that my children were fine and didn't need to be there. They insisted on a lumbar puncture. My ped won't see babies there anymore because the hospital gives parents such a hard time and keeps the babies as long as possible.
he should be able to explain why they think the baby has an infection and what it is.
S.
K.P. answers from Houston on July 29, 2009
You're in a hospital full of doctors and a new baby. If you question anything get the second opinion. Keep asking questions.
A.M. answers from El Paso on July 28, 2009
A general infection? Of what? Lungs? Blood? Heart? The doctor should definitely be able to provide details. What counts/readings/results etc. indicate an infection? I'd want to know all the details and if no one's got them, I'd definitely be seeking another opinion in a hurry. Congrats on the sweet baby. Hope it turns out to be something minor.
Email