13 answers

Anyone Have Experience with the "Your Baby Can Read" Videos?

Just wondering if other moms have tried this series with their kids and their thoughts on it? Thanks!

To answer the question, what do I hope to gain by these videos?" They are made by a fellow that has a pHd in infant learning, and he says that babies are best suited to learn language at age 0 to 4. He believes that it is actually easier for kids to learn written as well as spoken language at this time. He says his daughters who learned this way read much faster and really enjoy reading compared to their peers. He says although they memorize words at first, that ultimately they learn the sounds of the letters after they know enough words. I hope to have a child who loves to read and has lots of confidence in this area by doing well early on.

2 moms found this helpful

What can I do next?

So What Happened?™

Well, I really haven't heard much from people who actually TRIED the program on mamapedia. So I searched elsewhere, education blogs, etc. There are huge variations of opinion out there, but the ones who actually used it do seem pleased with how their children are doing. Perhaps they are very involved parents who would have taught their children well using any method. But I will share the thoughts of one such person (name excluded):

As a parent who has used the YBCR system I am amazed by the tremendous ignorance exhibited in so many of these posts. No, I am not an educator, but I am educated. And unlike most that have written here I do have years of experience actually using YBCR with my daughter.

Let me address a few of the more common fallacies:
1 - Regardless of how YBCR may be marketed, the system does require more than simply plopping your kid in front of the telly. If you were to actually read the information provided with the videos or on their website you would know this.
2 - YBCR is not a replacement for parental interaction. This reading program is only one more tool that a parent can use to help stimulate their child. We used the reading lessons as a way to bond with our child. Even though our daughter (now 3) can read books independently, she still loves to spend time every evening sitting in our laps to read books with us. She does not watch ANY television.
3 - No, YBCR does not just teach kids to "memorize words". Dr. Titzer's research showed that children best learn to read in much way that they learn spoken language, by associating the written words with the object, action , or image that the word represents. Kids learn to talk by hearing us say words and associating the words with what they see. YBCR does the same with written words. From exposure to the written language children will naturally learn the patterns and will soon develop the ability to recognize those patterns to new situations. Seeing our child gain the ability to read any word, even words she has not seen before, well before the age of 3 has convinced us that this is a far superior way to learn.
4 - Children are NOT deprived or harmed by teaching them to read. I have yet to see anybody back up a claim that children are harmed by learning. If this were the case then maybe we should try to prevent them from learning to talk until a certain educational-establishment-approved age. Why not take advantage of the young mind's amazing ability to learn? Learning to read at a very early age makes reading very natural thing for a child to do and allows them do perform better at everything else that they attempt.

We began interviewing schools a few weeks ago in anticipation of getting my daughter started in a Pre-K program within the next few years. Our primary concern was to find a school that would continue with the head start that we have given our daughter rather than stunting her growth. I have been amazed at the derisive comments from the professional educators when they find out that our daughter can already read proficiently. I can only surmise that these "educators" were more interested in protecting their establishment than in actually educating the children.

Even though I only have a single data point I can say the the results of using YBCR are spectacularly good. I can say without hesitation that teaching our child to read at an early age is the greatest gift that we could ever give to her.

Featured Answers

I personally have not used them, but this question has come up before on this site. If you use the search function, you can find lots of responses. From what I have read, the overall consensus was that it was not recommended. It teaches the child to memorize, not to actually read. Several teachers have posted and said that the kids who learn to 'read" this way actually have a harder time later in school when they need to learn to read the correct way (i.e., by sounding things out). We have decided not to use it.

1 mom found this helpful

More Answers

I personally have not used them, but this question has come up before on this site. If you use the search function, you can find lots of responses. From what I have read, the overall consensus was that it was not recommended. It teaches the child to memorize, not to actually read. Several teachers have posted and said that the kids who learn to 'read" this way actually have a harder time later in school when they need to learn to read the correct way (i.e., by sounding things out). We have decided not to use it.

1 mom found this helpful

It sounds like you've made your decision, but I just thought I'd share why we have opted not to do YBCR. A study published in 2007 found speech delays among children who watched EDUCATIONAL television before the age of 2. Several studies have also shown that children learn language much faster when interacting with a real, live person than a face on a TV screen.

There are believed to be two reasons that viewing causes delays: even if you don't just park your child in front of the TV to babysit the baby, video viewing necessarily cuts into the face-to-face time you spend with your child, which is the most beneficial from an educational standpoint. Also, many believe that baby's brains just aren't cut out for TV viewing and that it causes overstimulation and possibly interrupts some of the connections being made.

I will say that YBCR was not studied in the studies I mentioned above, so you might not find the same negative effects from using those videos. However, it is not a great leap to think that if one educational video causes delays that other might as well.

I absolutely agree with you about the importance of reading; I myself was a VERY earlier reader who always read many grade levels ahead. I learned to do this the way most early childhood educators suggest is best -- my parents read to me every chance they got and taught me letters and letter sounds from a very early age. I then learned to read phonetically, rather than memorizing specific words as with YBCR. I just wanted to point out that there are other ways to teach your child to read early that don't involve early television viewing or simple memorization if you wish to avoid those methods.

1 mom found this helpful

Just curious, as this question comes up again and again, what do you hope to gain if your baby CAN read?

1 mom found this helpful

If you teach your baby to read he will be bored stiff in kindergarten and first grade and probably learn to dislike school. Experts have discovered that the Baby Einstein videos have done nothing to improve a baby's brain and I dont think teaching a baby to read will make them any smarter either, when they learn math and science in school they will learn at the same pace as their peers. Also the social implications should be considered. Picture your 5 year old reading second or fourth grade books and bragging to his/her classmates. How would this make the classmates feel?

1 mom found this helpful

Why push it? Your kids will learn how to read! Everybody does! Read books with them, play with them, enjoy the outdoors, play music, teach them an instrument, etc. You don't need a special program (can you say $ rip off?) to foster a love of reading in your children.
As to your post about educators being derisive when they find out your daughter can read.... I'm sure these teachers tire of parents who think their kids are extra special and smart and MUST be treated that way and educated to their level. If your kid is that smart, then continue the teaching at home if you're doing such a good job. School would only be boring and you'd always be butting heads with derisive teachers. LOL

In my opinion, this system doesn't work. You are only teaching the baby to associate pictures (which the letters look like to them at this stage) with words, which they can already do. They will associate the letters with sounds at the same time as all other kids whose parents read to them. And the reason they read better and enjoy reading is because their parents are spending time with them do so. In other words, if you want a child who loves to read, can read early, and has confidence in that area, all you have to do is read to them, and make reading a fun, happy activity to do with mom / dad. Which you are probably doing already : )

I think the studies are ALL conflicting. I heard a study recently that said children actually learned faster in school if they watched a certain amount of educational tv.

I bought the YBCR set for my daughter BECAUSE....I had already been using video tapes of things like Bee Smart Baby vocabulary builders and my daughter loved them, so I wanted more of something similar. Yes, I needed a little bit of a babysitter, but what is the harm in seeing a bear then seeing the word bear or whatever animal?

We don't use the other tools as much, but I think children want to know, to learn and practice their skills. I use an Italian DVD with very simplistic pictures and words and my daughter listens so attentively, I don't think it is bad at all.

I actually bought the smaller set and you have to have your child watch the videos over and over and over. My son liked the flashcards but the videos got tiring. (You can get word flash cards anyware for a lot less) Actually, you can teach a dog to recognize words on cards in much the same way. Wouldn't recommend it... who cares if kids can recognize words at a younger age? They all catch up and even out in a few years. It wasn't very much fun and at that age... if it ain't fun, don't do it!

Required Fields

Our records show that we already have a Mamapedia or Mamasource account created for you under the email address you entered.

Please enter your Mamapedia or Mamasource password to continue signing in.

Required Fields

, you’re almost done...

Since this is the first time you are logging in to Mamapedia with Facebook Connect, please provide the following information so you can participate in the Mamapedia community.

As a member, you’ll receive optional email newsletters and community updates sent to you from Mamapedia, and your email address will never be shared with third parties.

By clicking "Continue to Mamapedia", I agree to the Mamapedia Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.