M.B. asks from Lexington, SC on March 05, 2009
VBAC Vs. 2Nd C-section
Hi ladies -- We had our first child two years ago and I had to have an emergency C-section. This time we (well, mostly me) can't decide whether to try for a VBAC or just go ahead and schedule a second C-section. I was wondering if there are any moms out there who have chose the VBAC option and been happy with their choice or were even unhappy with it. I'm hoping this will help me make my decision. Thank you!
More Answers
N.A. answers from Atlanta on March 06, 2009
I think the ultimate answer is up to your OB - I think you have to be a good candidate for a VBAC - ask your OB whether or not they think it's an option for you.
R.P. answers from Raleigh on March 06, 2009
Hi M.,
We ended up with a C-Section with our first because our daughter was tangled in her cord. I absolutely was determined not to have a C-Section if I could avoid it. So, we prepared ourselves for a normal, vaginal delivery - a VBAC with our second.
After only 5 hours of labor and 30 minutes of pushing, our 10 lb baby boy was delivered successfully VBAC. It was an amazing birth experience - so healing for me. I got to pull my son out myself and place him on my chest. He was nursing within minutes of birth.
I couldn't believe how much I could do after having a baby! It was incomparable to a C-Section. I highly recommend that you pursue a V-BAC!
Hope it goes well for you whatever your decision.
Warmly,
R.
B.W. answers from Myrtle Beach on March 06, 2009
One thing also to consider is that if you have a c-section this time you are pretty much going to have to have one anytime if you have more children. Very few doctors will let you VBA2C. And added to that the research shows that the risk to mom and baby goes up exponentially with each c-section. The first isn't too risky, the second is slightly more, the third goes up even more and about then Doctors start telling you that might just be enough. So, if this is your last baby maybe that isn't imporant, but if you want more children you may want to add that to your consideration.
If there wasn't a medical problem that is likely to repeat that caused your C I would surely go with vaginal birth. the risk of VBAC is lower than the risk of complications with a second C, besisdes the fact that the recovery is so much easier. Doctors jump to C-sections way too often, IMO. 30% of births can't possibly need a C-section. It just doesn't make sense.
Best Wishes,
Mama of 4, the most recent born 12/22/2007 at home with midwife in attendence
B. answers from Augusta on March 05, 2009
If you want to go VBAC then try it, if it's not possible then they can always do another C section.
My second was a section cause he got stuck. Why was your first a Csection? My first child got stuck as well and she was pulled out via suction, my second child even bigger got stuck even worse and we had to do an emergency section to save his life. He would NOT have come out the right way. My point is try it VBAC if you want ,then later if something happens don't be down on yourself if you need to do second c section.
I will say that I healed ALOT faster from the c section than I did from my first birth that was vaginal.
L. answers from Atlanta on March 05, 2009
While I haven't had a VBAC, I did have an emergency c section with my first and opted to have a c section with my second. I made the decision to have a repeat because my pelvic region is narrow and there was a chance of my son getting stuck like his brother. I can say that a scheduled c section is completely different than an emergency, at least in my case. I was terrified to have another c section due to the complications I had with the first. However, everything went great! I had an awesome team of doctors and nurses and was sitting up and alert when I cam e out of the OR. I believe you just have to make the decision that you feel is best for you and your family. I would also take into consideration the reason for your first c section. Best of luck to you and congratulations!
M.A. answers from Charleston on March 06, 2009
Our first child was delivered c-section (he was almost two weeks late and just didn't want to come out -- he hadn't even dropped!). For the second child, we held out hope that he could be delivered vaginally, but he, too, was over a week late, and we ended up scheduling and having a c-section. The doctor was very understanding and also warned of labor causing old stiches to tear, but the c-section was scheduled only 3 or 4 days before it was performed. I'm glad we at least kept the hope for a VBAC, but remember, sometimes it's the baby who ends up making the decision!
M.
K.M. answers from Atlanta on March 06, 2009
My first was an emergency c-section. My next two were VBACs. There were no problems. It's nice to alert when your baby is born. But, of course, the only really important thing is that they come out healthy. Just as an added bit of info. I had doctors for my first two births - they were not around for most of the labor. I had a midwife for the third and she was there the whole time and totally attentive to me and the baby.
D.H. answers from Atlanta on March 05, 2009
I've had 5 kids and only one C-section. I AM SO GLAD that I've only had one C-section. I did not want to do that again. VBAC is a great way to go. I would avoid having another C-section unless you have some medical reason for it. I told my husband that I'd rather be on the side of the road, by myself, having another baby, than go through another C-section. I meant it. VBAC was great!
I thought I'd add a little more in. I have a friend and her husband is in the medical industry. He is a nurse, in management, etc. Anyway, she had a C-section with her first, and then had VBAC's with all the rest. Her husband argued the point that there was no medical reason as to continue the C-section. He assists in surgeries all the time, he knows the risks, but knows that a repeated C-section in their case was no necessary.
Here is a link that you could read, if you like: http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/HomebirthAfterCesa...
Email