M.S. asks from North Billerica, MA on September 15, 2010
Things That Schools Don't Teach but Are Critical to Child's Success
I am interested in your opinions on things that are critical to our childrens' success in life but are not the focus in our schools.
A few examples that I think of are Finances (saving, spending, earning), Time, Critical Thinking, Collaboration, Applied Math, Science, bringing right brain and left brain together to bring out creative problem solving and so on..
Our first daughter (7 yrs) is going into 2nd grade and I feel that she is not necessarily being prepared to succeed (loosely used, by success I don't mean making lots of money) in the real world!
I'd love to hear your thoughts on this topic.
2 moms found this helpful
So What Happened?™
Great comments everyone. Thank you.
I agree
* with the sentiments that school teachers are overloaded and many of them are doing their best.
* that parents should not completely rely on schools to teach our kids everything.
* that parents are kids first teachers, absolutely no doubt that.
* Thanks for pointers to books and other resources that we could use to augment school education.
* I am not certain that schools are only meant for teaching how to add/subtract or give out facts. Wouldn't that be easier done by machines?
* Isn't the meaning of "education" to bring out what is latent in a kid? (from the word Educare)
* Is there a point to focusing on Industrial Age Curriculum (when you grow up you SHALL be conforming cog in the wheel) which is not grounded in developing Values, using Left and Right brains, encouraging kids to become good Leaders and Change Agents to make the world a better place.
* I couldn't agree more about creative accountants getting into problems but only if creativity lacks integrity (Values)
I read each and every response here at least couple of times and it really makes me think and broadens my viewpoint. Thanks once again for your help.
Featured Answers
J.P. answers from Boise on September 15, 2010
I think that parents rely too much on schools to teach values (money is included in this). If they aren't being taught by example at home, learning at school won't make a difference. I do believe that there should be some of this scattered in other lessons though. Teaching kids how to manage time, etc., but so many parents step and do it (or the work) for the kids, there isn't much chance of them learning, even if they are being taught.
6 moms found this helpful
J.O. answers from Chicago on September 15, 2010
To become a successful, self sufficient person a child has to be taught those things at home. School is for book learning not practical things like how to fix a running toilet that is what parents are for. School is an extension of what needs to be learned not everything that needs to be learned.
J.
6 moms found this helpful
D.P. answers from Pittsburgh on September 15, 2010
I don't necessarily agree that these things aren't being taught--or at least having the foundation laid in 2nd grade with the basic concepts. I have a second grader and although school just got started, I can see that his reading assignments this year are geared more to thinking for himself and drawing conclusions from what he's read.
I DO think all schools should require a Personal Finances class. Lots offer it but I don't think it's a requirement. (Not in 2nd grade though!)
1 mom found this helpful
More Answers
J.G. answers from San Antonio on September 15, 2010
as a former teacher, I can tell you that teachers are OVERLOADED with work and can't ever teach all children everything. The good teachers try real hard, but children aren't always paying attention, and it's almost impossible for one teacher to make sure that all 25 children are on task.
I've taught 2nd, 3rd, and 5th grades. I have taught TIME in all three grades, touched on the topic of FINANCES (saving, spending, earning - We did this during Social Studies time talking about profit and using money to buy both 'needs' and 'wants' and helping teach the kids the difference between the two. Science is a subject that ALL teachers should be teaching, yet it is often set aside till the end of the day when there may be extra time. (Reading and Math often come first which makes sense b/c you need both reading and math in order to fully understand science). After learning Math concepts, THEN your daughter should learn to apply it. In other words, she'll learn how to add and subtract 2-digit numbers THEN they will give her a word problem and talk about when to subtract and when to add.
I could go on and on. Ther should be a list of standards that they are supposed to teach in 2nd grade. In Texas, they're called the TEKS (Texas Essentials of Knowledge and Skills). You can search for your state's standards for each grade and each subject and see what your daughter will learn this school year.
But what the teacher doesn't do, then we (teachers) hope and assume that the parents will be there to support and love and help and teach their children. Yes, we know not all parents are there to help their kids. But we have a full load of 25 kids to teach, plus probably have our own kids at home to care for too.
Good luck!
Update: Dana -- I think it'd be great to teach manners in school. I tried my best. It was not something that Texas required me to teach, yet our school really knew that our kids weren't getting manners at home. We tried teaching them (in 2nd grade even) to shake hands properly. Teachers would eat ther lunches with their students to help them learn to not chew with mouths open, etc. We expected students to look teachers in the eyes and call them by their names (not just "teacher" but "Mrs. Jones") Teaching manners in school would be something that each teacher would have to take upon him/herself to teach her students. I don't think it's something that any state probably requires to teach.
8 moms found this helpful
L.L. answers from Topeka on September 15, 2010
You can't rely on the school to educate our children it is our job as parents to bring them up educated we teach and learn from home not just school.Why would you rely on the school to teach and prepare them to be succesful in life when it is our duty as parents.As for time management my son has been telling time since he was in kindergarten,he knows what time means,we play games,he loves to work with tools using a tape measure graphing what he wants to make in dads garage uses right hand for hammer left hand for nail,he does so many things that was taught here at home before he entered kindergarten and now is in 1st grade.I was shoked what they teach in kindergarten adding,reading,writing words,making short stories,learning about presidents,using muscal insturments,I remember my kindergarten yr it wasn't anything like this...We all want our children to succeed in life..Changes will always be made in schools to further educate our children even without the funds.
7 moms found this helpful
J.B. answers from Atlanta on September 15, 2010
School is to teach facts and processes like basic math and writing and historical and scientific facts. Schools really are there to teach reading, writing and arithmetic! Some schools or classrooms do a good job with applied programs or collaborative learning/problem solving, but kids need to learn most of these things at home. I'm trying not to get off on a rant here, but I'm REALLY sick of parents having this idea that school is where their kids should learn EVERYTHING! I'm not yelling at you, but these are my opinions on what schools should be doing. We've dumbed down our educational system to suit people who refuse to teach their kids anything before starting school or while they're in school. If you want a critical thinker -you better teach those skills at home primarily by modeling critical thinking, questioning and teaching your child to question and analyze. As a parent, YOU exhibit how to solve problems creatively and use the skills they learn in school -like math skills -to show them how to apply them to everyday life. School is there to give the address and directions, but it's up to you as a parent to show them how to actually read the map.
For those classrooms not so overburdened with discipline problems and too wide of a range of abilities that manage to get into the actual processes -great -but you need to be prepared do most of the applied and creative learning at home or to find and pay for a private school that addresses higher and more critical thinking better than our public schools are able to.
7 moms found this helpful
M.L. answers from Colorado Springs on September 15, 2010
Here are my thoughts, for what they're worth. Although a seven-year-old is still working on basic academics, there are plenty of things she needs to learn before she grows up that she may not learn in school.
And perhaps the most important thing is values. Values always need to be taught and modeled at home - honesty, integrity, kindness, courtesy, selflessness, a good work ethic, and all the rest. This can hopefully include a solid religious faith.
Creative problem solving can be worked on at home. Second-graders are still working on addition and subtraction, I guess, which aren't supposed to be creative (accountants get into trouble when they get creative!), but parents can give their children guided opportunities to work out other situations on their own.
Exposing children to art, to music, to dance, even to some of the really good children's books that aren't in school libraries any more can enrich a child's education.
Not only exposing children to creativity but also giving children a chance to create at home can be a huge opportunity for them.
I never was much of a "worker" as a child, which I regret, because I now think that the more skills a person can learn growing up, the better off that person will be. These skills are not a substitute for academics but an addition to them. Using both brain and body is good.
You're right about the finances, although I learned some of that in school. My granddaughters (one of whom is a second-grader) love Dave Ramsay's children's books about managing money.
I think your post is excellent, and it makes me think: why do we keep on insisting that schools ought to teach everything children need to know? Parents are really their children's primary teachers. Let's quit shirking, roll our sleeves up, and teach.
6 moms found this helpful
J.O. answers from Chicago on September 15, 2010
To become a successful, self sufficient person a child has to be taught those things at home. School is for book learning not practical things like how to fix a running toilet that is what parents are for. School is an extension of what needs to be learned not everything that needs to be learned.
J.
6 moms found this helpful
M.R. answers from Chicago on September 15, 2010
I think students need to have experiences where they fail and are given the opportunity to bounce back from the mistake and adapt/change future decisions in an attempt to get a better outcome. I am all for parents being a strong advocate for their child when their child is lacking a voice or if the problem is serious enough to warrant involvement. Unfortunately, too frequently do mothers get involved at the earliest stage or with the tiniest of issues and the kid never learns how to fix mistakes or make corrections on his own. Why? Because mommy has always come along and cleaned up the mess for them.
Kids need to fail as they learn a LOT from failure. I'm not saying they constantly need to be faced with devastating adversity, but 'soft failure' at early ages can be helpful. And let's face it, every single person will fail at something at one time or another - getting cut from a team, not getting desired playing time, changes in peer group dynamics and shifting friendships, being late to school because they dawdled in the morning, getting a poor grade on a test because they didn't study. The 'pain' of failure can be a great resiliency builder, teaching kids how to bounce back from negative situations.
Life is not perfect. Not everything can be fixed by mommy. Sometimes things WILL suck but guess what? Each individual has the opportunity to go cry to mommy and have her strong arm someone into fixing it or they can accept responsibility and possibly look at the situation in a positive way.
6 moms found this helpful
J.P. answers from Boise on September 15, 2010
I think that parents rely too much on schools to teach values (money is included in this). If they aren't being taught by example at home, learning at school won't make a difference. I do believe that there should be some of this scattered in other lessons though. Teaching kids how to manage time, etc., but so many parents step and do it (or the work) for the kids, there isn't much chance of them learning, even if they are being taught.
6 moms found this helpful
H.S. answers from Cincinnati on September 15, 2010
Sorry, but this post bothered me on so many levels. I'm more than certain that it is not the job of schools to teach financial success. That is your business. A second grader wants stability at home, friends to play with, and education. Math, reading, science, Etc. If you want to teach her finance 101, go for it! If schools focused on those types of things, we would have a bunch of generally uneducated kids! I want my children to be happy, because in the end that is what life is about. If my daughter wants to be CEO of some company, or the ice cream truck driver, if she's happy, then that is all she needs. With all due respect, please let your kids be kids for a while. They have enough to worry about later in life!
4 moms found this helpful
Email