15 answers

Lyme's Disease

My 3 1/2 year old is being treated for Lyme's and I was just wondering if anyone else had any experience with it. The other week she was complaining of a headache (which she has been doing recently), nausea and had a low grade fever (102). This past sunday, I noticed a bulls eye mark on her leg and we immediately took her to the ER. They put her on antibiotic (Amoxicillin) and told me to f/u with her pediatrician. We went this morning and the doctor agreed it was the Lyme's rash and extended her medication for another 20 days (she will be on it for a total of 31 days.) They never "officially" tested her because they said the rash was a tell tale sign, and I have read that the test is actually not all that reliable. Anyway, the doctor said it was caught early and that she should be fine after taking all her medication. I was just wondering if anyone else had experience with this and if so, was that person tested. I feel like I should have pushed more to have her tested....not that I would have changed the decision to start the medication.

1 mom found this helpful

What can I do next?

Featured Answers

Hello! The experience I had was finding a tick in my ds's head when he was almost 2 years old. I knew if my husband or I tried to remove the tick it would not be pretty, so we took him to the local kids emergency room. They removed the tick and tested it. But in the mean time, he was put on antibiotics. The test for the tick came back positive for the bacterica that causes the Lyme disease. So I was happy to have had him on the antibiotics.

Good luck! The rash is usually an early symptom, so all should be fine!

More Answers

Really no need to test because of the bulls eye rash.
If it came back negative, would it change your mind
about treating? She should be fine after a month long
course of antibiotics. Been there. Good luck.

My daughter had the rash and was put on four different rounds of antibiotics because she had swollen knees, muscle aches and fatigue. After her symptoms went away she still tested positive so we put her on one final round of antibiotics. The problem with the test is that it can produce false positives. There is a pediatric Lyme specialist in new haven, ct if your interested. Let me know if you want his info. There's a waiting list to see him.

Hi J.,
I did not read the other responses so this may be redundant. My son had lyme disease when he was 2. He too had the bull eye rash. Thank God he did, and your daughter too, becauise some people infected with Lyme do not get the rash & the longer you wait to be treated the worse it is overall.

My son took amox. for 3 weeks and has been just fine sice. His dr. said that with this course of treatment he is 99.9% cured.

There really is no reason for any other type of test. The bull's eye is distinctive enough. The dr. was actually very excited when he saw it, actually happy, because he had an intern training with him that day and he was happy to be able to share my son's rash!

Do not let mommy-guilt get the best of you! You did the right thing!

Also, our pharmicist recommended chewable acidophilus daily while taking the amox to help keep the good bacteria there. Taking antibiotics for this long really can cause havoc on the digestive tract; diarhea, yeast infections. The chewable acidophilus tastes good. In fact, my kids are STILL taking it daily and it has been 4 years! It's good for immunity too!

In my opinion the correct course of action was taken. The appearance of the rash coupled with the other symptoms are in fact quite reliable. If she had no rash it might make sense to test further, but the blood tests can actually be less reliable than the appearance of a rash. She was lucky to be spared the blood drawing process.

To counteract the possible side effects of the long term antibiotic use (stomach pain, diarrhea), make sure she eats extra yogurt with live cultures or takes acidophilus (it replaces the 'good' bacteria in the digestive tract that the antibiotics will attack along with the Lyme bacteria). Hopefully your ped suggested it already.

Best wishes as your daughter recovers.

Chris

Hi J.,
Because she got the rash, she definitely has Lyme's, and it was far more important to get her on the antibiotics quickly than to do a Lymes test. It is very good that her Dr extended the dose for a full month, make sure she takes all her medication.

When this is complete, you may want to talk to her dr about having a lyme test to establish a baseline, then if she has the symptoms of head or body aches and fever in the future, without the bulls eye, they can give her another test to see if there is an increase indicating a new Lymes infection.

Hello! The experience I had was finding a tick in my ds's head when he was almost 2 years old. I knew if my husband or I tried to remove the tick it would not be pretty, so we took him to the local kids emergency room. They removed the tick and tested it. But in the mean time, he was put on antibiotics. The test for the tick came back positive for the bacterica that causes the Lyme disease. So I was happy to have had him on the antibiotics.

Good luck! The rash is usually an early symptom, so all should be fine!

The bull's eye rash only appears in about 50% of of the cases of Lyme's disease (making it fairly difficult to diagnose if you don't get the rash). However, when you get that rash, it is definitive. So you're right that the rash identification dosen't always work, but if you have the rash, Lyme's can be accurately diagnosed.

Also, 1 month of abx is standard (my father and brother both had Lyme this year and both were on abx for a month). Please do make sure she finishes the full course -- it's so important to completely wipe out the disease ... especially with Lyme, since it's not harmful long-term if identified and cured early!

I'm sorry your little one has to go through this! But I'm glad they found it early and I'm sure she'll be fine!

My son had a tick in his neck. His doctor tested him and put him on the course of antobiotics.
The test was negative but the doctor told me I should have kept the tick and brought it in because they can test the tick for lyme disease and always know for sure if it's even carrying it.
Not all ticks do. The nymphs always have lyme but not every adult tick does. I'm not sure why, you would think it would be the other way around.
My understanding of the test is it's not reliable because they only test one vial of blood one time. The bacteria may not be in the sample of blood they tested. They have to take the blood multiple times throughout the course of many weeks. I just watched a show about this on Mysterious diagnosis.

Required Fields

Our records show that we already have a Mamapedia or Mamasource account created for you under the email address you entered.

Please enter your Mamapedia or Mamasource password to continue signing in.

Required Fields

, you’re almost done...

Since this is the first time you are logging in to Mamapedia with Facebook Connect, please provide the following information so you can participate in the Mamapedia community.

As a member, you’ll receive optional email newsletters and community updates sent to you from Mamapedia, and your email address will never be shared with third parties.

By clicking "Continue to Mamapedia", I agree to the Mamapedia Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.