33 answers

Kindergarten Readiness - Maineville,OH

While recently at a preschool field trip with my daughter, I was at a table eating while discussing kindergarten with other moms, and was shocked at how many of the mothers there were discussing not sending their child this fall, but waiting a year because they're "not sure" they're ready for it.... As a child, if someone had a September birthday, it would be a consideration to hold off a year. It seems like times are changing drastically, and people are not sending 5 year olds to kindergarten? These children I know have EARLY birthdays. March, April... including my daughter who turned 5, six days ago. I can see if there was a speech delay, or other development issues, however, why not get started in school? I was never considering not sending her, and now I wonder if she'll be in school with mostly 6 year olds? I certainly don't like that idea, but she's 5, and that means kindergarten to me. These children who aren't being sent appear to be levels ahead of my daughter yet they're going to stay at home with mom and do preschool for another year. Any advise? Am I the one missing something? We're already registered..

What can I do next?

Featured Answers

It is my opinion and been my experience (I have three boys, all in school, all were ready and started when they were supposed to. Their birthdays are May, December and October.) that if a child is ready - emotionally, socially and academically - to go to school at the time the school outlines (cut off date for five yrs. old), then that child should go. Holding a child back because a parent wants them to be the oldest, biggest, best is not in the child's best interest, but is done to comfort the parents. Don't forget, often holding a child back from starting kindergarten results in a 19 yr. old senior in HS, which brings on other issues at that time.

However, if there is a reason - a delay, social/emoitonal issues, etc. - that make starting late a good idea, by all means, it should be considered. Often, you can have the kiddos evaluated by the school district (teachers, school counselors/psychologists) to get some input to the decision making process.

1 mom found this helpful

More Answers

Ugh! Parents are so funny.

They are so afraid their children will not do well in kindergarten? What on earth do they think is going to happen there? They learn to sit, listen, keep their hands to their sides, walk in a line, and recognize letters, learn a little reading and a little basic math.. Good Grief.

Most of these kids can use any remote control, work on and or play on the computer, electronic games, and cell phones,

I cannot always do all of that..without a kindergartners help.

If YOUR child is ready send her. I cannot imagine holding our child back and she was also one of the youngest all the way through school.

By 3rd grade it all evens out.

5 moms found this helpful

I hate this trend, I don't think it helps kids out at all. My oldest son turned 5 in June and went to Kindergarten in September. He's now at the end of 2nd grade and thriving. He has some kids in his class who were held back by their parents who have already turned 9! In 2nd grade! And not even the end of 2nd grade, some kids were 9 by Christmas.

If your daughter is ready, send her. There is no reason to hold her back, and I really do hate this trend. She won't be with mostly 6yr old, there will be brand new 5yr olds, and almost 6yr olds, and likely quite a few 7yr olds whose parents held them back. It won't affect her, she will do great!

4 moms found this helpful

I don't know either. It completely baffles me. I think it became popular when people (dads?) wanted to hold their sons back a year for sports reasons - i.e. they could be bigger and stronger and make the varsity team as freshman. I think that is a crazy reason to hold your kid back academically, but somehow it caught on. In my humble opinion, I think it's just selling your child short, plain and simple. I can understand holding a child back who is clearly not ready and has a learning disability or some other problem that would make them struggle, but holding back a normal kid is just weird in my book.

That said, my daughter will be turning 5 in June and actually was skipped ahead a year academically. She was home schooled for a while by my mom, a retired teacher, so when it was time to go to pre-K, she was reading by herself and doing her big sister's 2nd grade math. The pre-K teacher moved her into Kinder and she has done fine. The biggest challenge was that it's a full-day Kinder and my daughter was still taking naps. Most days she comes home and takes a quick nap before starting her homework, but other than that she has been fine. She's doing well academically (straight A's last quarter), and has made plenty of friends. The teacher says she's good to go for 1st grade next year. So... we're sending her. Of course people are horrified (horrified!) that we started her in Kinder at age 4, and furthermore are not holding her back next year - but honestly, if a kid's ready, they're ready, and who am I to sell my little girl short because of what other parents think should be popular?

2 moms found this helpful

Speaking from experience, my son's birthday is in May. His preschool teacher and my husband and I agreed that he was not ready due to maturity. He was most definitely prepared academically and socially. It was a difficult decision for me as my best friend's son whose birthday is a day after went to kindergarten.
My point is that each child is different. Everyone needs to do what is best for them and their family. No one has ever regretted waiting to send their child, but some have regretted not delaying their entry to kindergarten. Only you know what is best for your daughter.

2 moms found this helpful

Seems to me like these mom's have an unnatural fear that their kids won't be successful, or at the "top" of their kindergarten class?

I know that preschool has become the new kindergarten, and there is some pressure on kids and parents to be "prepared" for kindergarten. But I agree with you, except for some obvious developmental issue or a particularly late birthday, why would you not send a 5 year old to kindergarten?

I wouldn't want my son to be 5 and in the minority with a kindergarten class full of 6 year olds... that's weird and concerning to me. My son is 4 and will be in preschool next year, but I imagine we'll be dealing with this next year?

Interested in your responses.

2 moms found this helpful

Oh, honey. I often think there's something wrong with the mothers who talk like that. Perhaps they are co-dependent on their little children. Don't second guess yourself. If you think your child is ready, by all means, send her to kindergarten. She will be with plenty of five-year olds.

2 moms found this helpful

I think many people are nuts these days. They want their kid to be the oldest for some reason (better in sports since they're taller, first to drive among friends, be older when going to college, etc). All silly reasons, IMO, to hold a child back a year. Going to college when 17 is no big deal - in many countries, and even certain cultures here in the US, you get married at 17 so certainly a 17 year old about to turn 18 can handle living in a dorm and getting himself to class on time!

All my kids have summer birthdays - July and August. The cutoff date in IN is Sept 1 so that is why Sept birthday kids wait a year. My son's birthday is mid-July. It was NUTS his kindergarten year. He started on time, right after he turned 5. However, he was in class with 7 YEAR OLDS by the end of the kindergarten year (kids with April/May/June birthdays)! NUTS. I hated it. His TEACHER hated it. I'm sorry, but 7 year olds are in 2ND GRADE, not kindergarten! My son is now 7 and in 2nd grade. His teacher told me it's been getting worse and worse... after 20 years of teaching kindergarten she was about to quit and get a job at a preschool. She teaches kindergarten because she likes 5-6 year olds - not 6-7 year olds. I just don't understand why so many people can't follow the rules. If more people stopped holding their kids back, the teachers wouldn't have to deal with a 1-2 age range in the classroom -- that is disruptive to them and hard to teach because of the difference in maturity at those ages.

In many states, the cut-off date is Oct, Nov or even the end of Dec (following calendar year) so it's very common for 4 year olds to be in kindergarten and turn 5 during the school year. These kids do fine. Heck, most kids are in a full-day preschool program due to working parents before starting kindergarten so surely they can handle a full day at kindergarten. (we have full day K here). We all know that young kids learn best - so make your kid wait until he's older to start school? I just don't understand that at all.

Anyways... send your daughter. She's 5. She's ready. The kindergarten teacher will expect her to act like, well, a 5 year old! That means working on issues like standing in line, sharing, sitting still and getting alone well with others. Kindergarten teachers dont' expect those things to be mastered before starting school - that is what kindergarten is for.

When my son went to kindergarten, I was expecting the worse. He was the youngest (by far) and had soem developmental delays. We later found out he had ADHD, anxiety issues and Asperger's... guess what? He thrived in kindergarten! He did very well, and continues to do very well. He often complains that his classmates are so much older than him but we just explained the reasoning - we sent him on time and didn't hold him back like other parents did with their children.

My oldest daughter will turn 5 at the end of July. She's signed up for kindergarten and is really excited about it. She's ticked that one of her best friends at preschool won't be at kindergarten, though, because he mom is holding her back a year (a May birthday!!). Our youngest has a mid-August birthday and will go to kindergarten on-time, too.

ADDED: I just read through some comments... a few people have said "no one ever regretted delaying their child but some regret sending early". What a crock!! I know several people who totally regret holding their kids back a year once their kids were in school a few years. I know many teens who HATE being so much older than their classmates. I haven't talked with a single parent, though, who regretted sending their kids on time! Don't make generalizations.

2 moms found this helpful

No you are not missing anything, except that holding back a child who has a delay is even more damaging than it is to a typical kid. The data is so clear. Retention and holding back do not help kids an can cause a mulititude of issues down the road. Not the least of which is older high school kids are more likely to use drugs, drop out, or have contact with the juvinile justice system. This trend is truly hurting kids, I meet them all the time as an educational advocate. Children held back because they are "not ready" who are permenantly delayed in reading because they ran out of time for intervention before the window of opportunity closed (between 8-9) because they got started way too late.

Read about it at www.wrightslaw.com- look under Retention along the left side of the page.

M.

2 moms found this helpful

Required Fields

Our records show that we already have a Mamapedia or Mamasource account created for you under the email address you entered.

Please enter your Mamapedia or Mamasource password to continue signing in.

Required Fields

, you’re almost done...

Since this is the first time you are logging in to Mamapedia with Facebook Connect, please provide the following information so you can participate in the Mamapedia community.

As a member, you’ll receive optional email newsletters and community updates sent to you from Mamapedia, and your email address will never be shared with third parties.

By clicking "Continue to Mamapedia", I agree to the Mamapedia Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.