M.B. asks from Arlington, VA on July 11, 2010
Kindergarten Entry
Why do we delay kindergarten entry? It appears mostly to be because some kids have a harder time with "social skills" and other behaviors. In other words the kids are hard for the teachers to deal with, and they have a hard time playing independently with other children, so we hold them back.
The part I have trouble with is just because a child is "behind" in these areas when they are 5 years old, does that really mean they need to spend the rest of their academic life behind their "age peers"? There is such a wide range of development at this age, but there seems to be little tolerance to the differences in this particular area. I am wonder if anyone else is concerned about "red shirting kindergarten" and the long term impact?
My son turned 5 in April. The cutoff where we live is Sept 30th. He'll be almost 5 5/12 when he starts. One month shy of his 5 and 1/2 birthday to the day!
LITTLE MORE INFO: My son had two seizures when he was two years old and spent the last three years on anti-seizure drugs. They appear to have impacted his attention skills (ADHD-like stuff) and fine motor skills. He is now off the medication (just went off in April) we don't really know how much of this is going to self correct now that the drugs are gone and how much will stay with him. That is why we are struggling to figure out what to do. One of the psychologist we have consulted agrees with us, that trying it and holding him back after kindergarten if it doesn't work makes some sense.
So What Happened?™
I don't know for sure what we are going to do. I can tell you we are considering homeschooling, because we feel regular school is a bit like forcing a square peg in a round hole. We have also started the IEP process. We had a meeting Wed. and he was found eligible. We are waiting for the IEP meeting to be scheduled. I was very uncomfortable about the eligibility meeting. We wasted a lot of time. I am not sure I have the temperment to do the IEP process.
I would rather not send, but I also don't want to decide now that he will be a year behind where he should be for the rest of his academic life. I don't see how a fourth grader who has his 11th birthday in April, and then goes to a friends 10th birthday a few weeks later, isn't going to question themselves and think they aren't as smart as everyone else. Particularly, when some of his issues aren't going to go away. He is plenty smart enough, that isn't the problem, but he isn't going to be top in his class either. Thanks everyone, your comments have been helpful.
Featured Answers
S.T. answers from Washington DC on July 11, 2010
starting kindergarten on the child's schedule, not just because of age, isn't holding a child back. it's being sensitive to his individuality. nowhere else in life will people be artificially segregated by age peers.
there's such an unnecessary stigma about being 'held back.' i wish more kids were offered the opportunity to interact and learn at their own pace instead of being frog-marched along with the majority.
khairete
S.
3 moms found this helpful
More Answers
S.T. answers from Washington DC on July 11, 2010
starting kindergarten on the child's schedule, not just because of age, isn't holding a child back. it's being sensitive to his individuality. nowhere else in life will people be artificially segregated by age peers.
there's such an unnecessary stigma about being 'held back.' i wish more kids were offered the opportunity to interact and learn at their own pace instead of being frog-marched along with the majority.
khairete
S.
3 moms found this helpful
D.K. answers from Washington DC on July 11, 2010
I truly don't believe in ever forcing children into anything they're not ready for. Personally, I don't think that boys especially should be forced to sit still and pay strict attention until they are 8yo at least (and truly it depends more on the child than the age). And neither does Dr. James Dobson, author of "Bringing Up Boys". I think expecting children to act like adults when they are 5 years old is insane! If you let them be kids now and don't force them to grow up, they will surprise you in their early teen years by how mature and adult they have become. Especially if you always treat them with respect and listen to their opinions. After all, we are not raising children, we are raising future adults.
I made the choice to homeschool so that I could work my kids' educations around their lives as it should be, not the other way around. My children have their own unique qualities accounted for every day and have realistic expectations in accordance with who they are, not by what AGE they are. Age is far too arbitrary an indicator. As you yourself mentioned, there IS a wide range of development at this age. My children also have tons of great, wholesome friends and a wide range of activities out of the house. They're very well rounded; more so than most public school kids I know in fact.
In my honest opinion, no child should be in government schools unless their parents have no other choice. That was the original intent of government schools. Compulsory attendance didn't become law until the Great Depression and then it was only to keep kids out of the work-force and keep jobs open for adults. The academic abilities of Americans has been declining ever since. Homeschooling isn't the "fad" here. Government school is. Homeschooling has been in use for MILLENIA. Compulsory government school has only been in use for the last century and has an abysmal track record already. Homeschooling produced people like our founders, compulsory government school produced people like our current administration. Enough said!
If your son is special needs in any way, or suffers from any "delays" I would strongly encourage you to look into homeschooling. You'll be glad you did.
Just my opinion though. It's how I choose to operate and others have the right to choose how THEY will operate.
Sorry if I got a little off topic, but I wanted to give you another option to think about and one or two good reasons to think about it. I have a gazillion other reasons, all well thought out and researched. If you're interested in hearing them, shoot me a message.
2 moms found this helpful
L.C. answers from Washington DC on July 11, 2010
Boys mature at a much slower rate than girls - Sometimes a little maturity goes a long way. You don't often see much difference at the elementary level, but by middle school, the differences are huge.
Those kids who started "early" or "earlier" are notoriously the ones who act out in class, get in trouble more often, and are socially "behind" their peers.
I had an 8th grade math/science class that I taught for 8 weeks - the kids who were the most obnoxious, got in trouble, and generally made a nuisance of themselves were the kids who were started before they were socially ready. They are the ones whose parents insisted that they start kindergarten at age 5 when they were not socially ready.
YMMV
LBC
2 moms found this helpful
B. answers from Augusta on July 11, 2010
Both of my kids miss the age cut off so they are both the oldest in their classes. It hasn't hurt them. The only problems we have had is that they are ahead of their peers in academics. They absorb knowledge like a sponge. But that really doesn't have to do with their age.
I was held back a year as a child and the only time it was a problem is when people thought I was a yr younger than I was because of my grade. Frustrating for a high-schooler.
2 moms found this helpful
M.F. answers from Sioux Falls on July 11, 2010
I put my oldest son in a TK program before kindergarten. It was the best descision! He was old enough for regular kindergarten and was very articulate, but, I had heard wornderful stories about transitional kindergarten. Dylan thrived in both TK and the next year in kindergarten. He was at the top of his class and well liked by both his peers and teachers. We moved by the time my middle son was kindergarten age. There was no TK program and he was bored in daycare, so I sent him to kindergarten right at 5. He struggled academically and socially until middle school! I saw a huge difference between their two experiences! I wanted to hold him back after kindergarten and the school fought me! He is not a learning challenged kid, he is actually off the hook intelligent, his social skills were just a bit behind and he was very tiny for his age. It just took a long time for the stigma of not fitting in to go away. If I could do it over, I would wait another year before sending him to kindergarten. It would have made his life alot easier. It is so hard to watch your child struggle to fit in. Especially when big brother fit in so well!
He is fine now. I don't think I ruined his life, or anything. But I will never ever recommend sending a child to kindergarten right away if there is ANY concern whatsoever about his or her readiness. I have yet to hear of a mom say, "I wish I would have sent him sooner." I hear everyone say, "I am SO glad we waited!"
Think of it as giving him an etra year of childhood!
1 mom found this helpful
S.H. answers from Richmond on July 12, 2010
My stepson was held back in kindergarten. He is ADD to the max - unfortunately has to take a lot of meds but even they don't always help. Anyhow, they knew he would be held back - his preschool teacher told my husband and his ex that he was not ready socially or academically and would not pass if they sent him. Luckily, my husband was then in a financial situation where he could afford to send him to private school for a year of kindergarten. This allowed him to get a year of kindergarten under his belt - get practice with the stricter classroom setting, learn some of the basics, etc. - without "failing" and being left behind while his peers moved forward in the public school. He went to our local public school for the 2nd year of kindergarten and he did well and has moved on up with his peers since. That said, in 4th grade I believe it was, one of our neighborhood kids (who had been invited to our son's bday party) figured out he was a little older than the other children (he turns the age in August then his peers start turning that age during the year). He put two and two together and started teasing our son for being held back. That is something you have to be prepared for. Personally, I think your idea of homeschooling or another alternative for 1 year is a good one. Being held back while your friends move forward has to be difficult. Good luck. P.S. We actually decided not to go the IEP route as it is a pain and we felt our son is more than high functioning enough that he has to learn to deal with the hand he has been dealt as we all do.
1 mom found this helpful
G.H. answers from Chicago on July 11, 2010
Where we live the cutoff is Sept. 1. My daughter is turning 5 the day school starts, Aug 25th. I am not putting her in for a few reasons, but I don't consider my choice redshirting because if she was born on her actual due date I wouldn't have the option of putting her in. She is extremely shy so much that she still takes a long time to warm up to anyone even people that have been in her life consistantly & sees on a regular basis like my sister who we see several times a week. She is also on the smaller side. She is very much a follower with her friends. My dghtr has had 2 yrs of preschool & the teachers have said she would benefit waiting one more year for both social & academic skills. My dghtr will not participate if she is unsure of the correct answer, she does not like to be wrong. I am not worried about her academically during k-2nd grade, but it's 3rd grade & up that starts to become very challenging for kids academically & socially & dealing with peer pressure, etc. I would like her to be a bit more mature to learn how to deal with those challenges.
I haven't seen most parents that holdback due it because of just social skills. I have seen it more for academic. And some because there child is very hyper. And for boys so that they can be bigger for sports. But to each his own, I just hope parents look at their reasons and know that it's truly for the best interest of their child.
Best wishes for your son & I hope he does well being off the medication.
1 mom found this helpful
K.C. answers from Washington DC on July 12, 2010
My only concern to holding him back from kindergarten is that if the behaviors that were triggered by the medications that he was once on are out of his system, the way he acts now just might be learned. He has gotten used to acting this way. Wouldn't putting him in the correct K class with other kids who are behaving 'correctly' show him the proper way to conduct himself. Just holding him back would almost reinforce the way he is acting now.
It seems like it would be better to put him in K and if he had to repeat K than at least he will have a solid foundation. An extra year of preschool seems like it would do him a disservice, sort of 'baby' him.
I don't know what your plans are, but GOOD LUCK! I think whatever decision you make will be good for your son!
K
1 mom found this helpful
Email