23 answers

Kids Taking Care of Kids...

I was pleasantly surprised today, when I showed up early to pick up the girls from vacation bible school. The kids were in the middle of some song and dance, they're separated by grade (preK-5), and all the parents and chaperones were just leaning against the walls, watching... The 4th and 5th graders were dancing with the 3rd graders, the 2nd graders were helping the preschoolers, and the 1st graders were helping with the kindergarteners.

To me, it was pretty cool seeing my 7 year old holding a preschooler, helping the 'baby' dance (and maybe not get stepped on, LOL)

But to see kids helping/holding kids... I kind of laughed and said 'this is babysitter HEAVEN!'...

Some woman next to me said 'Oh NO, none of these kids are old enough to babysit!'

I said 'Why not!? They're doing great, and I bet none of the parents asked them to help out like that. Even as a mother's helper, these kids are wonderful!'

The woman shook her head and said 'No dear, it's not appropriate for kids to take care of kids'...

I dropped it, just shrugged and smiled, but I saw it in a completely different light. I guess because I was seeing how things go on at our house... My kids are super independent and the girls help with the baby ALL the time.

I've even left my girls home alone for 5 minutes so I could run to the store. Yeah, I took the baby and told the neighbor they were there alone (in case I wasn't back in 5 minutes), but still... they proved themselves trustworthy for that 5 minutes.

And you know, in 3rd world countries, that the NORM, for kids to take care of other kids.

So what do you think? Do you HAVE to have an adult or teenage sibling helping out? Or would you be able to let your kids go under the care of a child not too much older than themselves, assuming they are mature enough to handle it? I'm not saying for babysitting with no adults for hours on end, but like if you had to go to the grocery store for 30 minutes or something?

1 mom found this helpful

What can I do next?

So What Happened?™

@BUG, WHAT?! Rape?! Whatever point you're trying to prove, I'm not getting it. I'm using as an example, younger children who show advanced maturity and allowing them to help out. I mentioned the 3rd world country example because the father's are off finding supplies, protecting their villages, etc, and the mothers are in charge of finding and preparing food, the children are left to their own devices, and while I know rape occurs, rape is still statistically lower than the benefits of children being raised by siblings not much older than themselves. Read a book, google it, whatever. That was way extreme and completely went outside of the question.

@Sue, a MILLION flowers ;)

Featured Answers

20 minutes of playing with a 3 year old doesn't qualify a 7 year old for the great responsibility that comes with caring for another child. There is a difference between simple entertainment & "taking care" of a child.

10 moms found this helpful

I didn't read the responses... but No Way would I leave my 7 year old to watch littles. She is very responsible. She sees me care for kids all day long and imitates what I do. She has a good head on her shoulders. It's not really about her *ability* or willingness to do it for me...
It really takes seconds for something bad to happen, and I would never put her in a position to be responsible for another child. Certainly would never go to the store and leave her to watch little ones. People in third world countries do it out of necessity, not convenience. Sorry Mama, I think you're way off.
Mother's helpers is a different thing. You're in the house, accessible to the kids and the helper. And I still think age 7 is way too young.

9 moms found this helpful

More Answers

My girls have grown up in a daycare. They understand completely how important it is to be careful. Each of them went through stages where they were very good with the little ones and a lot of help. I agree that most of the time they are very good with each other. But there have been times when it wasn't that way. They had bad days or times when they were tired of the little ones or didn't want to share their things. They went through times where they would lash out. They are kids. They can't be expected to behave in a grown up way or professionally. They need care themselves.

One day I heard screaming and ran the 10 steps into the room they were in. One of my daughters was sitting on top of a bean bag chair which was on top of a child! Of course I freaked and went off because they don't realize how easy someone can suffocate. Other times one or more of my daughters went from vacuuming to sucking the skin of a child with the end of a hose.

I don't think it's appropriate for us to assume that just because a child is mostly responsible, most of the time, that they will always be. Kids do stupid things! That's why they choke each other until they die and dare each other to do other dumb things.

11 moms found this helpful

20 minutes of playing with a 3 year old doesn't qualify a 7 year old for the great responsibility that comes with caring for another child. There is a difference between simple entertainment & "taking care" of a child.

10 moms found this helpful

I didn't read the responses... but No Way would I leave my 7 year old to watch littles. She is very responsible. She sees me care for kids all day long and imitates what I do. She has a good head on her shoulders. It's not really about her *ability* or willingness to do it for me...
It really takes seconds for something bad to happen, and I would never put her in a position to be responsible for another child. Certainly would never go to the store and leave her to watch little ones. People in third world countries do it out of necessity, not convenience. Sorry Mama, I think you're way off.
Mother's helpers is a different thing. You're in the house, accessible to the kids and the helper. And I still think age 7 is way too young.

9 moms found this helpful

OK--well 3rd world countries do a lot of things that aren't exactly what I would consider "right" or "safe"! LOL

I think it's wrong if only that you would NEVER want to put that type of burden on your 7 yo, God forbid, something happens to the little one and it wasn't even her fault or out of her control.....she would carry it with her the rest of her life. That's reason enough for me to vote "no".

Now, entertaining the baby while you cook dinner--sure. A 7 yo "in charge" for 30 mins? No way.

8 moms found this helpful

Just because some kids can help entertain other kids with supervision, does not mean they can watch them unsupervised. In fact, isn't it illegal to leave kids alone under 12 or something? There is too much that can happen, and not all kids have good enough judgement.

I think what Bug meant is that third world countries are not great for basing our standards, because they generally are not quality places to live. "this is how it's done in third world countries"...people on here say this all the time about a lot of topics (breastfeeding, cosleeping, etc.) as if this is what we should strive for...as you said, people in third world countries do things out of necessity, not always because it's a good idea, or because they want to.

I'm all about kids learning responsibility and helping out, but they need to prove that they are responsible by showing they can handle all situations...and be of a safe, acceptable age. You just never know what can happen, and I wouldn't want to take a chance...

8 moms found this helpful

My daughter is 9 now and has loved taking care of younger kids always. She often goes to her big brother's house and watches and plays with his kids (age 7, 5, and 18 months). They love having her there. Our neighbors like having her come over to play with their younger children, also. They are not left completely alone, there is always an adult within earshot, but she keeps the younger ones busy and entertained for hours.

We are denying our children important learning experiences if we give them absolutely no responsibility or credit for simple things they are capable of doing. How is a kid suddenly OK to be a babysitter at whatever particular age, if they haven't been given increasingly more chance to show that they can be responsible with little ones?

Please read the book "Free Range Kids" everyone.

7 moms found this helpful

Your 7 yo should not be responsible for taking care of your 5 yo when they are alone. She is not mature enough - and no, I don't have to know her to make that statement! She is 7 YEARS OLD! As R. H pointed out, what if your 5 yo HAD started choking? Does your 7 yo know how to do the Heimlich? She may have the sense to call 911 or go to your neighbor's if she figured out quickly enough what was happening. But by then, it would be too late.

Personally, I find it hard to believe that you could get out of the house with the baby, get to the store, buy what you need, and get back all in five minutes.

I admit that I allowed my responsible 8 yo son to stay alone for 15 min. periods, and increased it to 30 mins when he was 9. But he did not care for his younger sister until he was 10 and she was 7, and they both knew the rules well enough that I could trust them. By then, my son had already had a first aid and cpr course, and could tell me what he would do in any scenario I gave him. Now he is 12, she's almost 9. I leave them alone for up to 2 hours, and I stay within a 25 mile radius from home.

Sue W. -- I'm all for giving children responsibilities. Such as chores! And caring for pets. And at 7 yo, HELPING keep an eye on a younger sibling, with an adult on the premises. As they age, their responsibilities should increase. Children learn through imitation. They watch what we do, and emulate it. Therefore, when a child becomes 11, 12, or 13, they have the sense and ability to care for younger children because they have seen us do it. They have had enough life experiences (and hopefully read of other's experiences in books) to make a good judgment call. And they should have first aid and cpr training, to boot. So it's not "all of a sudden" they are able to babysit. It's what they learn over the course of the five years between 7 and 12.

Children should be allowed to be children. We are the adults.

6 moms found this helpful

I totally get what you are saying here.

In my home at one point there were six children 10 and under. Yes the older ones were paired off with the younger based on personality. It gave the moms of the house a chance to cook, clean, shop, etc.

Since our culture here in America doesn't cherish or crave huge families. It is hard to understand this concept but when you have to care for 5 or more children at a time, you appreciate this all too well.

Most may not even remember the 1 room classroom where all the grades where in one room and the teacher taught them all. How the heck could she do that if the children didn't cooperate and help.

Yes sometimes children are taken advantage of but that also happens with adults and teens watching the kids (especially teens) but it still takes a village even if that village isn't "grown" yet. Great post.

5 moms found this helpful

Required Fields

Our records show that we already have a Mamapedia or Mamasource account created for you under the email address you entered.

Please enter your Mamapedia or Mamasource password to continue signing in.

Required Fields

, you’re almost done...

Since this is the first time you are logging in to Mamapedia with Facebook Connect, please provide the following information so you can participate in the Mamapedia community.

As a member, you’ll receive optional email newsletters and community updates sent to you from Mamapedia, and your email address will never be shared with third parties.

By clicking "Continue to Mamapedia", I agree to the Mamapedia Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.