20 answers

Honey and Peanut Butter Help?

I know that they say NO honey for babies... but what is the age that it is safe to give them honey? I'm not saying directly out of the bottle but used in cooking as an ingredient/marinade for chicken etc... I made vanilla honey french bread this morning, and ended up making a plain piece for my 19 month old because I wasn't sure.

Also -- I have the same question about peanut butter. No one in my family has a history of peanut allergies.. but I don't know when it is safe to try peanut butter with my son.

Thanks in advance!

What can I do next?

Featured Answers

You can cook with it at any time, it's fresh and raw honey that you can't give them and it's for the first year. Peanuts are fine after a year as long as there is no history of allergies in the family. Although latest studies say that there's no need to wait on foods for allergies because it doesn't make a difference like they used to think it did. Either way, start with small amounts and see if there's a reaction.

Honey is 1 year ... I thought pb was a year too, but I was told 15-18 months... although, I gave my son pbat like 7 months.... but pb isnt a risk for botulism like honey is, it is just a choking hazard and the allergy thing... so as long as you spread the pb thin enough and give it to him early in the day so that you can keep an eye on him for a reaction, I would say go ahead and give it to him... good luck!

More Answers

It seems like most people are educated about the risks of feeding honey to babies, but I'd like to share the following well-referenced information, in case anyone who reads this thread is not aware of the risk.
"The concern is with infant botulism.

Botulinum spores are found widely in soil, dust, and honey. Adults who swallow botulinum spores are almost never affected. When infants swallow the spores, however, the spores can germinate in their immature gastrointestinal tracts and begin producing botulinum toxin. This has occurred even when the honey was only used to sweeten a pacifier (European Journal of Epidemiology, Nov 1993).

Botulinum toxin is the most poisonous natural substance known to man. The lethal dose is only 0.###-###-#### mg per kg of body weight -- an amount that would be invisible to the naked eye. This tiny amount in the blood stream can cause death within minutes through paralysis of the muscles used in breathing.

Infant botulism has been found on every continent except Africa (Journal of Perinatology (2007) 27, 175–180). In the United States it is most common in the states of California, Utah, and Pennsylvania. While infant botulism can occur from taking in soil or dust (especially vacuum cleaner-bag dust), eating honey is the number one preventable cause. Corn syrups are not sterilized and may also be a source of contamination (The AAP Red Book, 2000).

Infant botulism can occur any time in the first year of life, but like SIDS it is most common in the first six months. In fact it has been suggested that it might be the cause of death in up to 10% of SIDS cases (Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics; Saunders 1992).

Thankfully, in most instances of infant botulism, the amount of toxin is so incredibly minuscule that the case remains mild. For this reason it is often misdiagnosed.

The first symptom of infant botulism is constipation (which is also a common benign finding in many infants). This can appear 3 to 30 days following ingesting spore-containing honey (The AAP Red Book, 2000). Typically, the parents then observe increasing listlessness, decreased appetite, and weakened cry over the next several days. Nursing mothers often report new engorgement. Sometimes this is the full extent of the disease. If the disease progresses, however, the child moves less and less and might begin to drool from the mouth. Gagging and sucking reflexes diminish. Loss of previous head control is also an important sign. Complete respiratory arrest can occur either suddenly or gradually.

If an otherwise healthy baby develops constipation, followed by weakness and difficulty in sucking, crying, or breathing, then infant botulism should be considered the most likely diagnosis until proven otherwise.

When infant botulism is diagnosed, the average Intensive Care Unit stay for the baby is about one month, typically including mechanical ventilation and continuous tube feedings. This is followed by another 2 weeks on the hospital ward, with a total hospital cost often exceeding $100,000 (Pediatrics; Feb 1991). Thankfully if the botulism is correctly diagnosed and the baby receives appropriate supportive care, almost all will recover fully and completely. The fatality rate for babies who have been hospitalized with botulism is less than 1%. Recently, an antitoxin for infant botulism has been developed and shown to reduce hospital days, mechanical ventilation, and tube feedings (The AAP Red Book, 2000).

The single most effective way to prevent infant botulism is for infants to avoid honey.

Therefore, despite other health benefits, honey is an unsafe food for any infant. HONEY SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN TO CHILDREN YOUNGER THAN 12 MONTHS."

Source: http://www.drgreene.com/21_825.html

ALSO, a question in a previous post was "WHO says no honey for babies???" Interestingly, one answer to the question is IN the question. The World Health Organization (WHO) says: "Infant botulism has been associated with honey contaminated with botulism spores. Mothers are warned not to feed raw honey to their infants, as Clostridium botulinum spores in honey have in a few cases resulted in infant botulism."

Source: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs270/en/

1 mom found this helpful

My peditrician said that once he was 1, that he could have everything we ate. Now I have a few friends whose children have severe food allergies and I try not to give him things with nuts. We don't eat a lot of food or use honey a whole lot. I heard and have read that if you hold off on giving the nuts until after age 2 you can reduce the risk of an allergy.

Babies under 12 months old shouldn't be given honey due to the risk of boutilism (sp). If it's cooked (like in honey nut cheerioes, bread or other foods) then it's OK for them to eat.

As for peanut butter, the latest studies show that it doesn't matter when it's first introduced. If a child has a peanut allergy, then they have a peanut allergy regardless of it they find out from eating it at 12 months old or 2 years old. All my kids were eating peanut butter by 18 months and were fine. We just watched them extra closely for a few hours after the first time they had it. While it may seem like every kid these days has a peanut allergy it's still a very small percentage so the chances are pretty great that your child does not have it.

Good questions. I believe that honey is safe after age 1 (before that, the concern is botchelism ~spelling?~) I waited until probably your son's age, as well, for both of my children, but I dont' think that this applies to using it as an ingredient?

PB I waited as long as possible on account of peanut allergies, just to be on the safe side. But the other caution with PB is choking. You know how dry it can be and can make it hard for little ones to eat sandwiches. I waited until after age 2 w/ the first and probably just before age 2 w/ the 2nd.

Reading some of the other answers here. I've always been told no honey until 1 year as well. Give the poor baby some vanilla honey french bread. ;)That sounds yummy!!

If no one in your family has had trouble with allergies, give him a try! He'll LOVE IT! There are days that is the only thing I can get my children to eat! It will take 3 to 4 exposures to see if he has any kind of reaction. But just look for rashes, hives, obviously, shortness of breath, or things out of the ordinary. He's old enough to give it a try for sure. Good luck!

Hi S., it's 1 yr. when you baby turns a yr. old, then you can try him on honey and p.butter.

Honey is 1 year, peanut butter is 2 years. I have read that many posteres have felt that since there are no allergies in their families that they are safer for introduction to peanuts at any age- not true. We have no allergies in either side of my or my DH's family and we found out the hard way our daughter (at 10 mos) is allergic to Lima Beans, green beans and peas, but is negative to EVERYTHING else including peanuts. Moral of the story: You can never be too careful and you just never know.

You can cook with it at any time, it's fresh and raw honey that you can't give them and it's for the first year. Peanuts are fine after a year as long as there is no history of allergies in the family. Although latest studies say that there's no need to wait on foods for allergies because it doesn't make a difference like they used to think it did. Either way, start with small amounts and see if there's a reaction.

Required Fields

Our records show that we already have a Mamapedia or Mamasource account created for you under the email address you entered.

Please enter your Mamapedia or Mamasource password to continue signing in.

Required Fields

, you’re almost done...

Since this is the first time you are logging in to Mamapedia with Facebook Connect, please provide the following information so you can participate in the Mamapedia community.

As a member, you’ll receive optional email newsletters and community updates sent to you from Mamapedia, and your email address will never be shared with third parties.

By clicking "Continue to Mamapedia", I agree to the Mamapedia Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.