12 answers

High Needs Baby

One day while on google, I accidentally stumbled on a dr sears website talking about babies that are high needs. Very interesting information! ( I was googeling issues with naps) I didn't think that a babies could be catagorized as a " high needs" I always thought that babies could be fussy or colicky, have gastric reflux issues....etc. Made me wonder if my infant is high needs.hmmm. Anyways I'm just writing this to try and get other moms opinion on this. Anyone have a high needs baby?? Anyone skeptical??? I Think it is an interesting subject. Not hear to judge. Oh and if you haven't read about what dr sears has to say about the subject, take a momment to look it over on his website, so that you may be more familiar and able to understand what I mean. Thanks mommas!!!

What can I do next?

Featured Answers

I love Dr. Sears. His books have helped me so much with both of my kids. I agree with the poster that said "high needs" is a nice way of saying "difficult" :D Both my girls were high needs babies. My oldest grew out of it at a fairly young age and now she's a very independent 3 almost 4 year old. My youngest is 17 months and is still, what I would consider, high needs. I think it's all personality. I know when my kids just need a cuddle versus crying for manipulation.

1 mom found this helpful

More Answers

Agree and Disagree. I was exactly in your shoes just a few short months ago. I was having problems with my son napping when I came across the concept of a high needs baby. I read through it and thought "Yep, that is my son exactly." Only not exactly. Some of the categories sounded like he was describing him exact, totally dead on. Others were slightly less so, a yeah I can see that. And one or two were, well I guess that could be him. Dr. Sears admits that all children exhibit varying degrees of all of the characteristics listed. And really in essence I think that's what it is, Dr. Sears is simply describing babies- all babies are high needs. It's what they're programmed for. Some just require a little more or less in different ways. That's what makes us unique, right?

3 moms found this helpful

My youngest has been miserable since he was in my womb...no exaggeration either. When he finally came into the world, he constantly cries, is never happy or content, does not liked to be cuddled...you get the picture. I've tried everything such as extra naps, stimulating activities, walks and exercise....to no avail. I even wore him for as long as I could--it worked sometimes, but not too often. This has been going on for 15 straight months. I got to the point where I posted a question on this site a few weeks ago and some mommas suggested an early intervention center. Well, I found one in my school district and he will be going there in a few weeks for an extensive evaluation since my pediatrician can't figure out why he is this way all the time. I hope these specialists can help us.

2 moms found this helpful

Ok i read it and completely agree. My daughter hit several of those. Notably the in womb movements! She could make me go numb for hours with some of her kicks.
I was so familliar with the mommy zone he described. As the toddler years hit she seems to be growing out of some of it. She is getting a lot more independent. Trust me i am still her first choice, she can now stay with a friend for an hour or so without screaming the entire time.
Knowing it was her personality helped a lot. Her smiles are just as big as her cries. I am a little disapointed that was not mentioned as well.

2 moms found this helpful

I love Dr. Sears. His books have helped me so much with both of my kids. I agree with the poster that said "high needs" is a nice way of saying "difficult" :D Both my girls were high needs babies. My oldest grew out of it at a fairly young age and now she's a very independent 3 almost 4 year old. My youngest is 17 months and is still, what I would consider, high needs. I think it's all personality. I know when my kids just need a cuddle versus crying for manipulation.

1 mom found this helpful

I think it's a really interesting article. I wonder, though, about context.

According to the article... my son hit 11.5 out of the 12... but in my mind, he was a VERY easy baby. We just meshed well (and a few years of psych & nursing classes helped... as did having a lot of experience around other people's babies - sibs, cousins, babysitting). But our personalites agreed, and providing what he needed at any given time was just kinda natural 99% of the time. Exhausting, sure, but not frustrating.

Why I wonder about context is this:

Both my son and I are ADHD. (As are many members of my family, ironically as far as genetics go, about 1:4). If you read down the list of ADHD symptoms EVERYONE relates. Everyone forgets things, everyone gets distracted, everyone can have several things on their mind (thinking multiple thoughts), everyone experiences intense emotions, everyone gets hyperfocused (intent/ driven/ passionate to the degree the world falls away), everyone gets sensory overload, everyone gets x, y, z FROM TIME TO TIME. Even for extended periods of time, here and there. But there is a HUGE difference between people with ADHD and non-adhd'ers.

Same token lots of people have "active" toddlers. It's hilarious, however, to watch 2 toddlers that both parents claim are active. The level of activity is often *radically* different. One parent can say non-stop and mean 10 hours... another parent says non-stop and they mean for a few minutes every hour.

Like Denise, I personally categorize babies as being high needs when they have something physically wrong with them (pick an organ, any organ, and anything that can be wrong with them), or a disability the parent is illequiped to deal with *in the beginning* (aka a deaf baby can be high needs for a hearing parent, but not high needs for a deaf parent or hearing parent who is conversant with deafness), or the mysterious and dreaded colic (crying every second that they're awake regardless of level of care for days/ weeks/ months), or a disease (aka a genetic disorder... like downs or "glass bones"... not an illness which is caused by infection), or certain illnesses (polio for example), or birth defects, or brain injuries, or extreme allergies, or drug babies, or babies with cancers, or autistic babies (like my cousin), or, or, or. The defining line being something that requires *expert* care, knowledge, and understanding... or extreme medical intervention.

Now... following MY definition... in my experience and observation...every baby who meets 1 or more of the above ALSO exhibits all or most of the12 of Dr. Sears signs of a high needs baby. My son had NONE of the above (he's adhd... but that's not something one knows at birth, and like a deaf parent of a deaf child... being adhd myself he's probably MUCH easier for ME to parent than parenting a 'typical' child), but he had 11.5 of the signs. And like I said... he was a super easy baby in my book.

So I wonder about context. Squares and rectangles.

1 mom found this helpful

High needs is not the same as "special needs". High needs is an interesting theory. When my daughter was an infant, I read Dr. Sear's website almost every day lol. My daughter fit the "high needs" description to a tee. She was colicky, fussy, needed held ALL the time. She could not fall asleep on her own, she could not self-sooth, etc. I think Dr. Sear's is right on the money. I also think the term "high needs" is a nice way of saying "difficult" baby lol. Weather you buy into the terminology or not, I think Dr. Sear's has a lot of great advice. I followed his advice and my daughter has grown into a wonderful, enjoyable toddler. That first year was rough though! Good luck with your baby.

1 mom found this helpful

I don't have high needs kids, but know enough to know that it happens!

to me a high needs baby has a disability of some sort. ex hard of hearing adhd,downs, deformities whenborn. in my opinion speechtherapy kids are not high needs. the reason I say this is my oldest needed speech butwas not special in any other area. he is now a normal kid. he was just that speech delayed. he was also colicky i never considered him a high needs baby. just a normal kid who needed a little extra attention. now my youngest is hard of hearing farther behind in speech than his brother was and I do consider himhigh needs. because he needs more attention due to he cant hear. jmo

Required Fields

Our records show that we already have a Mamapedia or Mamasource account created for you under the email address you entered.

Please enter your Mamapedia or Mamasource password to continue signing in.

Required Fields

, you’re almost done...

Since this is the first time you are logging in to Mamapedia with Facebook Connect, please provide the following information so you can participate in the Mamapedia community.

As a member, you’ll receive optional email newsletters and community updates sent to you from Mamapedia, and your email address will never be shared with third parties.

By clicking "Continue to Mamapedia", I agree to the Mamapedia Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.