S.C. asks from Cortland, IL on October 23, 2006
Episiotomy Information
Looking for the pros and cons of having a episiotomy
Do most Dr's still do this?
Featured Answers
R. answers from Chicago on October 23, 2006
I think the general advice is not to have one - even if you tear, it's meant to heal quicker and there are less likely to be complications. I tore badly and it was uncomfortable for a few weeks - lots of stitches etc but healed well and I would rather go through that again than have an episiotomy.
More Answers
S.B. answers from Chicago on October 23, 2006
Hi S.! You know, I think that there ae some Dr's. that still do this, but there are alot that do try to stay away from it if at all possible. I have been to alot of births. I am a labor doula. Most of my clients have not had to have episiotomies. The best thing about not having one, is that the soreness in the vagina area is not as bad. I had one with my first child, plus ripped and you know, I was so sore for so long. I did not have one with my other two, and I felt great after a couple days. There is alot of good things about not getting one. Have you talked to your Dr. about this? How far along are you? One great thing you can do to help so you can reduce the chances of you having to have one is perineal massage. You can do a google search to get more info on this and how to do it if you dont know, or also there are books that can help you. It really does work. It helps stretch that area out so when the time comes, it is easier for the baby to come out. If you have any more questions or need any help, let me know.
S. Bailey CLD
Aurora
www.tendermomentsdoula.com
1 mom found this helpful
B.M. answers from Chicago on October 23, 2006
S.,
It shouldn't be standard practice. I just had a baby a month ago and my husbands main jobn was to make sure that there was no cutting. You would really rather let your body adjust to the baby rather than get cut.
I had superficial tears (soft tissue) and had no problem healing. When they cut you, its pretty deep.
B.
E. answers from Chicago on October 23, 2006
I did not have an episiotomy with my first. I had 2 stitches and was out and about in 2 days. I did have one with my second. It took weeks before I could comfortably sit or stand or anything. However, my second was 3lbs bigger than my first. (That definately had something to do with my healing and need for the episiotomy). I really think it depends on your body (do your kegals!), the size of the baby, and how well they are exiting. An episiotomy beats a C-section or any type of birth injury. Best of Luck with your delivery and episotomy or not, it is the most amazing experience of life.
E.
A.S. answers from Chicago on October 23, 2006
Many doctors do not do this routinely anymore. Also, a tear heals better and more quickly than the cut from the episiotomy.
For more info. check out www.mothering.com
I tore, but healed nicely without having the procedure.
Amy
S.V. answers from Atlanta on October 23, 2006
As I doctor, I still prefer an episiotomy to tearing any day, as if there is a tear, you never know how far it will go, the complications and healing. At least with an episiotomy- if it is done right, ( we were taught a cut to the side was better than a midline episiotomy-many now just do a midline episiotomy) you can see how well it is healing, and there's not excessive stretching or straining of the muscles in the area as there is enough room for the baby's head to get out. Another thing is you don't want any harm to the baby as he/she is trying to exit the womb.
Also, it's only routinely done for the first pregnancy. The second baby just usually pops out in their own.
It's your personal call, and you may want to discuss this with your doctor before the delivery, just to know he/she is on the same page.
Good luck!
L.M. answers from Chicago on October 30, 2006
I never thought of it as a big deal at all. I never even discussed it with my doctor or thought about it because I trust my doctor and knew that if it was needed he would ask me if it was o.k. and I would make the call if it came down to it There wwere so many other things to worry about for me, like the labor and delivery itself. I had a 9 lb. 3 oz. baby naturally and I did end up having one, the pain and healing was not even an issue for me. I was fine. Everyone will have a story of pro or con, as I have heard of people tearing horribly that chose not to have one. Ask your doctor and use your judgment. It is your call.
H. answers from Chicago on October 24, 2006
looks like you still have conflicting opinions :>) I had one and still tore but he was a big baby (9.7lbs) with a big head.
I can't say I noticed any difference to which bit healed first.
Ask your Dr what they think and their reasons. I went into the conversation with mine thinking I didn't want one, he's a bit old fashioned amd suggested one and in the end I had both.
best wishes for your birth by the way :)
D.X. answers from Chicago on October 23, 2006
I had an episiotomy AND I tore (all the way to my bunghole!). I did not find healing that painful at all. Yeah, I was "tender" down south, but no big deal. I'd let your doctor decide....after all....she's the professional.
Email