21 answers

Circumcise

Hi everyone - this is my first time asking a question. I am really in need of some advice. My 3 year son who we adopted is not circumcised and I am considering having it done. My 6 year old son also adopted is circumcised and so is my husband. I have been reading up on it and there are many opinions. I am confused. So far it has not been medically necessary but it seems that is does happen in the future due to hygiene issues.
So my question is should I or should I not do it. My son does not like bathing but I'm sure that will change as he gets older. Right now it's a battle. He is bathed every day but would care less if he wasn't. I don't want to hurt him but I also don't want him to have to possibly go through this as he gets older. Is he going to feel different? Look different and have self esteem issues?
Basically I need help. Any advice from any mom's who have gone through this would be helpful. I have an appointment to meet with a Urologist. So we will see what he says. My husband is supportive either way. He is also torn so this is why I have turned to you for help.

Thanks for any help you can give.

What can I do next?

Featured Answers

Listen to H C! If at some point it becomes medically necessary, that is one thing. Otherwise, let him join the ranks of the majority of men in the world who are not circumcised. We have a daughter, but if we had, or if we end up having a boy, we will allow his genitals to remain intact--in spite of the fact that my husband is circumcised.

If he hasn't had any issues at this point, he will probably be fine.

Good luck with this decision.

1 mom found this helpful

More Answers

I am a mother to two, healthy, happy, clean, intact boys. After reading up on information on all sides of the issue, my husband and I chose not to consent to circumcision for our sons. They are now 6 and almost 3, and we have had no issues with cleanliness, phimosis (overtight foreskin) or difficulty toileting. We do not regret our decision at all, and many other parents I've met have made the same decision for their sons.
I learned there is no special care required for an intact penis, and the boy himself should be the first person to retract the foreskin to prevent tearing of the tiny frenulums that attach the foreskin to the glans( kind of like the frenulum under your tongue.) As the foreskin gradually loosens it will retract easily by age four or five. Some parents worry about the little pearly white pieces that are revealed during the loosening process, but I learned it's not dirt, it's just the skin cells that are shed and they wash away, no big deal.
I also suggest reading the information at www.mothering.com, but there are also some other sites. Admittedly, they offer a case against circumcision, at www.intact,org and www.nocirc.org, I believe, so maybe they will seem biased to you. But honestly, afte reading everythihg I could get my hands on while pregnant with my first son, I started to see circumcision as a strange and painful cultural custom with roots in ideas I was not comfortable with. For example, my family isn't Jewish, so I have no religious reasons for circumcising. And since it was started in the U.S. in the 1920's as a way to stop masturbation (and was touted as a cure-all for everything from hair loss to eczema) I felt like it never has been a legitimate medical issue. Now we're cultural obsessed with cleanliness, so that's the reason we hear about most, even though being intact is probably cleaner. You might be interested to know that the American Academy of Pediatrics (which is typically a very conservative organization) no longer recommends routine infant circumcision. My own pediatrician's sons are intact, and he does not perform circumcision. He says for him, it violates the Hippocratic oath ("first do no harm") and removing healthy, functional tissue is not an appropriate surgery to him. It was also interesting for me to learn about the fuction of the foreskin--I'd always been taught it was merely "extra," but I've since learned that the glans of the penis is actually a mucus membrane and is not intended to be constantly exposed. It's like removing your eyelids and leaving the eyeballs exposed to constant germs, etc. I actually think having some covering over the glans is cleaner and healthier, especially in infancy with diapers and early childhood with sandboxes, frogs snail, puppy dog tails--you name it. It also preserves additional sexual function, as you will read about.
The procedure of circumcision is traumatic--a board with velcro straps called a "circumstraint" is used. I think a three-year-old is much too old to be subjected to that sort of trauma, even if he were under general anesthesia. Because it's important to build trust with your kids--especially your children who come to you through adoption--it seems to me like your son is too old for your to consent for him on this issue. It's his body; he could choose later, but if you celebrate his normalcy and wholeness, I doubt it will ever be an issue. The numbers in the U.S. for circumcision are dropping radically--ten years ago it was about 50 percent, but now it's even lower as more parents are questioning tradition for tradition's sake. Also--my first son was at a children's hospital for a couple weeks after he was born and all the pediatric urologists there recommended against circumcision. One of them has a son who is ciscumcised and a younger son who is intact, and the younger boy asked his older brother "what happened to you?!" So it's not the issue we might think it is. ;) That doctor said he told his boys that he was always learning as a doctor, and he always tried to do the right thing for his boys, and when he learned better, he chose better.
I'm sure you'll do what's right for your family. Good for you for wanting to learn more. Good luck!

4 moms found this helpful

Dad here so understand that in terms of my opinions...

First of all, WAY TO GO on choosing adoption!

I am circumcised, our son--whom we adopted and at birth--is not. At least you're not using that ludicrous "he won't looks like dad/brother/uncle Tim" argument. (Soap box alert--if dad only had one arm does that mean Junior has to have his arm lopped off?)

No, circumcision is not *medically* necessary at birth unless there is some sort of penile/foreskin defect. Our first pediatrician (in New Mexico) said that if a boy doesn't have *chronic* UTIs by age 2 then he'll be fine. Soap box again: one of my favorite things to recount is that the UK decided to remove circumcision from the list of payable procedures covered under the country's national health plan. So doctors would still perform the surgery--and make no mistake, it IS surgery--BUT the parents would have to pay the bill! Yeah, the rate of circumcision plummeted to single-digit percentages the following year.

As for the hygine issue, the USA, Isreal and Arab countries are the only ones that circumcise on a wholesale routine basis. Penises are not falling off men and boys the rest of the world over! Besides, as I tell my friends...I've had to clean out fecal matter from our 4 month old daughter's vaginal folds just about every day compare with never when it comes to our son's foreskin. BTW you *do* know that you shouldn't even try to retract his foreskin at that age, yes?

You need not be concerned about him looking different than other boys. Many school lockerrooms have private stalls nowadays and even in the communal ones at school or the Y, boys are going to me more concerned about whose is bigger or who is growing more pubic hair etc. (Trust me on this) There will be less emphasis on who is cut and who isn't.

Parents Magazine, June 2008 issue, page 38
"Fifty-six percent of boys in the U.S. get circumcised, according to a new survey. But there are vast regional differences: Midwesterners and Northeaterners are more than twice as likely to circumcize their sons as Westerners." (The West includes Utah)
Circumcision rate by region:
Midwest 75%
Northeast 65%
South 56%
West 31%

My final soap box moment...as far as I can tell, he's perfectly healthy? No frequent (ie more than 7) UTIs last year? Well then why even consider the surgey? Better yet...are you also considering having his tonsils removed? How about his appendix? Unlike the foreskin, medical science hasn't fully understood the purpose and function of those organs.

Off my soap box. Be prepared for arguments both for and against circumcision. But really, IMHO the only argument for that I can see as valid is if it's medically necessary *right now* or for religous purposes.

4 moms found this helpful

There is no medical reason to do it, I know you have a lot of response, but this is a hot topic and a decision and in the end it has to be your decision. I have 4 boys and 3 girls, and circumsion was never an option for me, doesn't matter that daddy wasn't done. Here are my reasons why (both sides)...

1. They will look like daddy....how many boys walk around looking at their dads penis?
2. It is better for hygiene.....so long as they bathe every few days what hygiene issue is there?
3. It is cleaner......once again a bath will take care of that.
4. Less infections.....statistically not true both sides have about equal issue chances, once again a bath every few days take care of it there is only a 1.8% difference.
5. Will be embarrassed as he gets older.... about, but not quite 50% of the population isn't circumcised.
6. Girls will find it gross...as you can see many woman don't have an issue with it, and if they did it is going to be a lot harder to pick a man who isn't and they could be missing out on the man of there dreams.
7. They won't remember something that happened at three or younger.....there may be no lasting scares, on the outside, but many people can remember that far back, especially if it is traumatic. Lots of molestation victims remember from that early on, even if it isn't a physical memory they are still traumatized none the less.

Here is a good sight to take a look at.....

http://blogs.webmd.com/all-ears/2006/08/circumcision-unki...

Whatever decision you make good luck!!

3 moms found this helpful

You know, he's three and there is no medical need, why make him go through a surgery that is not everwhelmingly benefical?

America is the only country that routinely circumcised babies without religious persuation.

When you read your research, pay close attention to where the fact are coming from. Is there motivation to say one thing or another? You wouldn't expect an in-house study of Nissan to come back saying Nissan is substandard to other cars--it'll obviously come back saying Nissan is better and safer.

Circumcision, by itself, with only 3 a week brings in enough money to provide over $40,000 a year. How much do you make in a year? Consider this when looking at England's standard of circumcision; prior to socialized medicine when physicians were paid based on individual services approx 98% of male babies were circumcised for medical necessity, yet, by miraculous intervention, after the switch to socialized medicine, the rate fell to less than half of one percent. How could that be? All off a sudden the need for circumcision practically disappeared?! Yet we find no outburst of cancers, we find no concerning or alarming rates of infections for which the World Health Organization has intervened.

And just for perspective on infections: the average female baby is FOUR times as likely to contract a urinary tract infection than a male child with his foreskin...but nobody freaks out over little girls.

In the end, you need to trust your motherly instinct...it doesn't matter one wit what any of us say...for it or against it. What matters is your little boy. Does he have the right to choose to give up a piece of him or is it posing such an imminent danger that it must be removed for the safety of his health?

3 moms found this helpful

Oh, please don't do that. He is just fine and it will be extremely traumatic for him to go thru that type of pain at his age. Circumcision is not necessary at all- it's cultural. You can find people with opinions on both sides, but there really is not scientific evidence that it's hygienically better or worse (unless he has generally bad habits like not bathing for weeks). It's such a sensitive issue and he's not any more likely to have a problem than your other son. I say let him be and just love him!

2 moms found this helpful

I have three boys and none of them or my husband are circumcised. My middle boy- now 7 years old had a problem with chronic infections on his penis when he was about three. The urologist treated it for months, stressing that a young child does not need to undergo circumcision unless absolutely necessary. He said that there are more risks with have the circumcision done that is worth it and the boys are fine without this procedure. After several months of treatment, he was fine and the doctor said it was good he never had to undergo the surgery. My oldest is 12 and has never had a problem as far as "looking different" or having other problems. There are a lot of boys that are not circumcised these days, so I don't believe that will be a problem. They just need to be taught how to clean themselves properly and they will be fine. I don't recommend putting your son through the pain and possible side effects of the surgery if it is not absolutely neccessary. Hope this helps!

2 moms found this helpful

Hi K.,

My son is almost 18. We opted NOT to circumcised because God thought it should be there. Plus, my husband (I know he was kidding) said that he felt a lot of pain when he was circumcised as a infant.) LOL.
My boy has had no problems. Also, I think it is a help for a young man to keep himself pure. Not that it makes them self conscience but that they are special.
My hubby also says that he had wished that his mom and dad had not done that to him, as he would have more to have fun with. Men, I tell ya.

Hope that helps you to decide.
Cath

2 moms found this helpful

Listen to HC! He is right on. I don't even believe infants should be circumcised. To do so to a 3-year-old seems cruel and unnecessary. There are many good resources online and elsewhere that can guide you and your husband in caring for and teaching your son to care for his intact penis. Glad you asked this important question!

2 moms found this helpful

Required Fields

Our records show that we already have a Mamapedia or Mamasource account created for you under the email address you entered.

Please enter your Mamapedia or Mamasource password to continue signing in.

Required Fields

, you’re almost done...

Since this is the first time you are logging in to Mamapedia with Facebook Connect, please provide the following information so you can participate in the Mamapedia community.

As a member, you’ll receive optional email newsletters and community updates sent to you from Mamapedia, and your email address will never be shared with third parties.

By clicking "Continue to Mamapedia", I agree to the Mamapedia Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.